> I’m building with binutils 2.17.50.0.6, which is a bit old but I cannot find
> any mention of needing later binutils on the installation notes.
> Is bootstrap broken, or am I missing something?
Second build, this time with trunk binutils. Still fails in libsanitizer at
stage1, this time with:
Trying to build trunk rev. 204619 with --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, I get a build error in stage1-target-libsanitizer:
> ../../../../trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc: Assembler
> messages:
> ../../../../trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sa
On 11/09/2013 03:44 PM, Alec Teal wrote:
> If Java must go, and it must have a replacement Ada makes sense. The
> issues with Go (sadly, you guys are doing superb work) do make sense.
>
> I don't know enough about Java (the GCC front end and such) to know if
> it should go, if it does go why sho
If Java must go, and it must have a replacement Ada makes sense. The
issues with Go (sadly, you guys are doing superb work) do make sense.
I don't know enough about Java (the GCC front end and such) to know if
it should go, if it does go why should it be replaced?
Alec
On 09/11/13 11:55, Eri
> Right now Go does not build on a range of targets, notably including
> Windows, MacOS, AIX, and most embedded systems. We would have to
> disable it by default on targets that are not supported, which is
> straightforward (we already have rules to disable java on targets it
> does not support).
