Hi,
As you probably noticed, I relinquished my GCC maintainer privileges
(including the Release Management bit which was still set.) It was a very
difficult decision, but I'am taking on a new rôle that is incompatible
with my continuing being a GCC maintainer or contributor. I would like
to emp
Has there been an implementation or design of a way of representing 64
bit pointers with ilp32 on a 64 bit system? I know this sounds like it
is rather pushing the boundary and one should just use the lp64 but I
believe it could save effort in a number of circumstances. What I was
thinking of i
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 02:36:14PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> FYI, I'm attaching a WIP patch with the splay tree stuff, debugging
> target-1.c with OMP_DEFAULT_DEVICE=257 right now (with all tgtv related
> stuff removed), but hitting some error regarding OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_POINTER
> reallocation, su
Hi,
I'm working on dumping gimple for "omp pragma target" stuff into
gnu.target_lto_ sections.
I've tried to reuse current lto infrastructure as much as possible.
Could you please take a look at attached patch?
gomp_out.patch
Description: Binary data
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:11:09PM +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
> > FYI, I'm attaching a WIP patch with the splay tree stuff.
> Thanks, I'll take a look. By the way, isn't it better to move splay-tree
> implementation to a separate file?
As it is just a few routines, heavily modified from
> But I doubt dirent.h is portable to all targets we support, so I believe it
> needs another configure test, and perhaps we want to define some macro
> whether we actually support offloading at all (HAVE_DLFCN_H would be one
> precondition, HAVE_DIRENT_H (with opendir etc.) another one (for this t
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:29:30PM +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
> Here is the first patch for adding plugins support in libgomp - could you
> please
> take a look at it?
>
> I changed configure.ac to add dl-library, but I am not sure if I regenerated
> all
> related to configure files pro
Hi Jakub,
Here is the first patch for adding plugins support in libgomp - could you please
take a look at it?
I changed configure.ac to add dl-library, but I am not sure if I regenerated all
related to configure files properly. I'd appreciate your help here, if I did
it wrong.
Any feedback is we
Hi Nathan,
> This is an interesting design. It appears similar to how we'd
> envisioned implementing openacc support -- namely leverage the LTO
> machinery to communicate from the host compiler to the device
> compiler. Your design looks more detailed, which is good.
Thanks, do you have a simila
On 09/13/13 10:34, Michael Zolotukhin wrote:
Hi Jakub et al.,
We prepared a draft for design document for offloading support in GCC - could
you please take a look? It is intended to give a common comprehension of what
is going on in this part.
This is an interesting design. It appears similar
Hello,
Adding Richard who might want to take a look at LTO stuff.
--
Thanks, K
Hi Jakub et al.,
We prepared a draft for design document for offloading support in GCC - could
you please take a look? It is intended to give a common comprehension of what
is going on in this part.
We might publish it to a GCC wiki, if it is ok. And later we could fill it with
more details if n
12 matches
Mail list logo
