Hello all:
I have send the related issues to "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla";, please
check if you like, thanks.
currently, I only send 3 bugs: Bug58256, Bug58400, Bug58401, the other
bugs may duplicate with these bugs, so I do not send (if they are also
valuable, I will send too).
Next, I should
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 10:18 -0400, Tim Prince wrote:
> Current Intel implementations of safelen will fail to vectorize and give
> notice if the value is set unnecessarily large. It's been agreed that
> increasing the safelen value beyond the optimum level should not turn
> off vectorization.
Y
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 15:37 +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> sometimes it can be useful to annotate loops for better vectorization,
> which is rather independent from parallelization.
>
> For vectorization, GCC has [0]:
> a) Cilk Plus's #pragma simd [1]
> b) OpenMP 4.0's #pragma omp
