Re: Inefficiencies in large integers

2013-08-18 Thread Asm Twiddler
Hello Oleg, On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Oleg Endo wrote: > On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 00:55 -0400, Asm Twiddler wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I'm not sure whether this has been posted before, but gcc creates >> slightly inefficient code for large integers in several cases: >> > > I'm not sure what th

gcc-4.9-20130818 is now available

2013-08-18 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20130818 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20130818/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Goodbye from our Newsletter

2013-08-18 Thread SCIKNOW
Goodbye from our Newsletter, sorry to see you go. You have been unsubscribed from our newsletters. This is the last email you will receive from us. We have added you to our "do not send list", which means that our newsletter system, phpList, will not send you any further messages, with

Call for Papers and Peer Reviewers- Sciknow Journals

2013-08-18 Thread SCIKNOW
Hi, SCIKNOW Publications Ltd, USA publishes peer-reviewed and refereed multidisciplinary journals in an Open Access Model. The objective of SCIKNOW Publications is to provide a forum for the publication of articles covering a wide range of academic disciplines. In pu

Re: Toolchain Build Robot

2013-08-18 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > I just added a different view. All results can also be viewed as a > timeline, both per-buildhost and per-target: > > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/timeline.php Nice! Would you like to add a reference to http://gcc.gnu.org/testing/ ?

Re: Inefficiencies in large integers

2013-08-18 Thread Oleg Endo
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 00:55 -0400, Asm Twiddler wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm not sure whether this has been posted before, but gcc creates > slightly inefficient code for large integers in several cases: > I'm not sure what the actual question is. Bug reports and enhancement suggestions of that k

Re: Should -Wmaybe-uninitialized be included in -Wall?

2013-08-18 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >> This points to other ideas: >> 1) how about adding a helper switch to show what is included in Wall? >> such as -Wall-print > > Doesn't > > gcc -Q -Wall --help=warnings > > give you this? Yes, but...how would I know to use this? For example, g