In case anyone is planning to attend the BOF on Sunday and missed the
proposal document posted last month, it can be found here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AndrewMacLeod?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=gccrestructureplan2.1.pdf
Andrew
Dear Affiliate,
How are you? If you are interested in generous CPAs, please register now
as affiliate on http://www.binaryaffiliates.com/?am=40 This month, we
offer an additional $25 per trader, at the top of the regular $250, for
one selected brand.
Binary Options allow clients to profit, w
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:11:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> FWIW basically -Werror -Wall defines a compiler version specific
> variant of C. May be great for individual developers, but it's always
> a serious mistake in any distributed Makefile.
Not always. Any project large enough (or serious
Hi,
I encountered below example,
79: r169:SI=r190:SI<<0x2
115: r180:SI=r180:SI+r169:SI
116: cc:CC=cmp(r181:SI,r190:SI)
117: pc={(cc:CC==0)?L125:pc}
The register r169 is only defined by insn79, so I was hoping the
reference in insn115 can be replaced by "r190<<0x2", thus saving one
ins
>> the changelog mentions the addition of the new "U" constraint, but the
>> actual patch is missing it.
Yes, I think you got it right.
I have resubmitted this part of the patch again and confirmed the commit in svn.
Best Regards,
Kaushik
On Fri, 2013-07-12 04:42:26 +, Kaushik Phatak
wrote:
> > I guess you forgot a small patch to constraints.md, because since this
> > commit which uses a new "U" constraint, the rl78-elf target won't
> > build:
> > 2013-05-31 Kaushik Phatak
> >
> > * config/rl78/rl78.md (mulqi3,mulhi3):
