On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:17:54PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 5 July 2013 16:43, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I ran aspell on comments in gcc. After bit of cleaning a list with
> > frequencies is here. It is still relatively noisy and more heuristics
> > are needed.
> >
> > http://kam.mf
> Deprecate it for 4.9.x.
> Remove it later. We don't need to keep around
> this macro which has been obsolete for at least
> two releases.
Agreed. Definitely deprecated for 4.9.
The internal style is to now check __cplusplus and in the future
whatever feature testing macros are developed.
-be
Paulo Matos schrieb:
I am convinced that what I am about to ask is not possible but I
would like someone to confirm this.
Can I define in an insn a register constraint that depends on another
register value? So, for
(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand:SI 1 "regi
On 5 July 2013 16:43, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
>
> Hi, I ran aspell on comments in gcc. After bit of cleaning a list with
> frequencies is here. It is still relatively noisy and more heuristics
> are needed.
>
> http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~ondra/gcc_misspells
>
> What we will do with this now?
It doesn't l
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:04:32AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 4 July 2013 08:20, Marc Glisse wrote:
> >
> > The script could do with some improvements, but it would be good indeed to
> > fix some of those typos.
> >
> > - the script creates non-words : suppresss
>
> Yes, I noticed "functin
Hello,
the DejaGnu testing framework uses text output to return status information for
non-native targets, e.g.
PASS: g++.dg/tls/thread_local6.C (test for excess errors)
spawn psim -i ./thread_local6.exe
powerpc-rtems4.11-run is /opt/rtems-4.11/bin/powerpc-rtems4.11-run
OpenPIC Version 1.2 (2
2013/7/5 Paulo Matos
>
> Hi,
>
> I am convinced that what I am about to ask is not possible but I would like
> someone to confirm this.
>
> Can I define in an insn a register constraint that depends on another
> register value?
> So, for
> (set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "r")
>
Hi,
I am convinced that what I am about to ask is not possible but I would like
someone to confirm this.
Can I define in an insn a register constraint that depends on another register
value?
So, for
(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r