On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, YU Chenkan wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm trying to generate a (very simple) special data section at
> link-time. It seems that LTO is too heavy, though I'm also not quite
> familiar with it.
>
> I think that what I first need is a new output format which wraps the
Dear all,
I'm trying to generate a (very simple) special data section at
link-time. It seems that LTO is too heavy, though I'm also not quite
familiar with it.
I think that what I first need is a new output format which wraps the
standard ELF, so can anyone help to point out where I can get s
Hi Timo,
On Fri, 24 May 2013, timo.ja...@go-part.com wrote:
> I was wondering if you are still accepting mirrors for GCC.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
>
> If you are, I will like to provide one with HTTP, FTP and Rsync access via
> a VPS located in Australia, USA, UK, Philippines or Japan
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20130601 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20130601/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Sat, 01 Jun 2013 22:12:51 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> In both cases you cannot actually use the memory at *p. I think gcc is
> detecting the indexing but not the access.
That makes sense!
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 23:19:45 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> It is not a bug, the warning isn't guaranteed
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 11:08:21PM +0200, Jens Bauer wrote:
> Here's my result:
>
> ---8<-8<-8<-
> elementTest.c: In function 'main':
> elementTest.c:27:19: warning: iteration 8u invokes undefined behavior
> [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
>eightMembers[i] = 0;
>
On 06/01/2013 10:08 PM, Jens Bauer wrote:
> I would expect gcc to complain when it meets the second loop as well as the
> third loop, but it didn't detect that there is something wrong with the
> second loop.
>
> ...Is this a bug ?
C allows you to index one element beyond the end of an array.
Hi list.
I think I've found a bug in where gcc checks if array indices are in range.
Here's my test-code:
---8<-8<-8<-
/*
* file: elementTest.c
* command-line:
* arm-none-eabi-gcc -O2 elementTest.c -o elementTest
*/
#include
uint8_t eightMembers[8];
int main(int argc, const
On 29/05/2013 9:41 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Ryan Johnson
wrote:
Maybe I misunderstood... there's currently a (very small) cache
(unwind-dw2-fde-dip.c) that lives behind the loader mutex. It contains 8
entries and each entry holds the start and end addresses f
Dear All,
It is my pleasure to announce the long-awaited MELT 0.9.9 rc1 plugin release
candidate 1 for GCC 4.6, 4.7, and 4.8. This is a significant improvement
over previous MELT plugins. In short, mixing at will MELT and C/C++ code
is even much easier than before (in particular, because with
10 matches
Mail list logo