On Tue, 7 May 2013 13:29:30 +0200
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> GCC 4.8.0 has been released more than one and half months ago, and the
> number of bugfixes on the branch is growing (70 fixed bugs with 4.8.1
> milestone so far, including 5 P1s), and additionally the C++ frontend
> re
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:02:08AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Richard Biener wrote:
> >We're going to look at supporting HSA from GCC (which would make
> >it more or less trivial to also target openCL I think)
>
> For the friends of link-time optimization (LTO):
>
> Unless I missed some fine p
Is anyone else seeing this build failure with ToT GCC? I am
building the mips-mti-linux-gnu target on an x86 linux box and
the libgcc build fails because the newly built GCC is dying.
Before I try to figure out which patch broke this I wanted to see
if anyone already knows about it.
Steve Ellcey
On 2013-05-07 07:29 , Jakub Jelinek wrote:
There is one P1 bug currently open (--disable-nls bootstrap issue
on MinGW, Diego, can you please look at it?)
Sure. I'm (finally) on it.
Diego.
"Paulo Matos" writes:
> So I guess the problem (which might not be a problem after all can't be
> reproduced in m68k and
> it's fine.
I don't think m68k is using BImode anywhere.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 8
Dear Sales,
I'm interested in your products. Pls provide your best offer for the following:
(1) CIF Colombo
(2) Terms of payment (Irrevocable LC preferable)
We require 3 samples. Please quote us best possible Ex-Colombo, Bangladash
price.
Thanks.
Regards,
Vivian Jiang.
PRIME Shan
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Paulo
> Matos
> Sent: 07 May 2013 14:19
> To: Mikael Pettersson
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: BImode and STORE_VALUE_FLAG
>
> In the meantime, where is FPmode defined in m68k?
>
>
Got it
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikael Pettersson [mailto:mi...@it.uu.se]
> Sent: 04 May 2013 11:51
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: BImode and STORE_VALUE_FLAG
>
>
> I can't comment on the code in question, but the backend for m68k may be
> affected
> since it defines
Status
==
GCC 4.8.0 has been released more than one and half months ago, and the
number of bugfixes on the branch is growing (70 fixed bugs with 4.8.1
milestone so far, including 5 P1s), and additionally the C++ frontend
reached C++11 feature completion milestone, so it is almost time to
relea
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> We're going to look at supporting HSA from GCC (which would make it more
>>> or less trivial to also target openCL I think)
>>
>>
>> For the friends of l
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> We're going to look at supporting HSA from GCC (which would make it more
>> or less trivial to also target openCL I think)
>
>
> For the friends of link-time optimization (LTO):
>
> Unless I missed some fine point
Hi Andrew.
Thank you, I will. Of course; I'm just a bit absent at the moment. ;)
In fact, I'm sure this must be a linker problem.
Love
Jens
On Tue, 07 May 2013 09:47:34 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 08:18 AM, Jens Bauer wrote:
>> Please let me know if I need to provide more informa
Richard Biener wrote:
We're going to look at supporting HSA from GCC (which would make it
more or less trivial to also target openCL I think)
For the friends of link-time optimization (LTO):
Unless I missed some fine point in OpenACC and OpenMP's target, they
only work with directives which a
Hi, all!
> Which accelerators do you intent to handle? "Accelerator" is a rather
> broad term, covering DSPs, GPUs, Intel's MIC, ...
The idea is to emit OpenCL from high-GIMPLE, for know. So, any device
that has OpenCL support can be utilized by ACC.
Maybe, we'll be able to reuse some parts from
On 05/07/2013 08:18 AM, Jens Bauer wrote:
> Please let me know if I need to provide more information.
I'm afraid you have sent this to the wrong place. The assembler doesn't
use gcc, and this is the gcc list. Please send it to the binutils list.
Andrew.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 07:41 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>
>> Evgeny Gavrin wrote:
>>>
>>> What do you think about support of OpenACC 1.0
>>> (http://www.openacc-standard.org/) in gcc?
>>
>>
>> I like the idea - though, I wonder whether OpenMP 4.0's "target"*
I'm using a GCC toolchain similar to Yagarto for making code for the LPC1768
microcontroller.
My gcc is version 4.7.2, my binutils is version 2.23.1
To make parts of my code run faster (a timer interrupt to be exact), I've used
a modified linker script, so that I get a '.fastcode' section.
The
17 matches
Mail list logo
