Hi
I am trying to implement a GVN algorithm as a plugin for GCC 4.6.
With help from GCC IRC channel, internals doc and reading the source,
I was able to get a prototype working for the case of a single block.
Now, I am trying to handle the case of confluence of multiple edges
i.e. obtain redunda
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20130504 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20130504/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 03/05/13 16:03, Richard Sandiford wrote:
David Brown writes:
Personally, I've used "naked" when I want to write pure assembly code
and don't want extra stack frames or "return" codes. I don't want to
write stand-alone assembly files (I've written mountains of them in the
past, and hope they
Mikael,
I haven't really tried m68k and I can't say I know anything about it but
it will only be affected by this issue I am seeing if it generates
instructions of the form:
(set (reg:BI ...)
(:BI (reg:SI ...) (const_int ...)))
If you have something like this then as soon as you expand t
On Fri, 3 May 2013 12:49:14 +, Paulo Matos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems to me there's a bug in
> simplify_const_relational_operation:simplify-rtx.c.
> If you set STORE_VALUE_FLAG to -1, if you get to
> simplify_const_relational_operation
> with code: NE, mode: BImode, op0: reg, op1: const_
