Hi folks.
In order to facilitate the contribution and possible merging of the
cilkplus work into mainline, I have created a new git branch
(cilkplus-merge). I have also created a wiki page where we (Balaji and
myself) will keep a status of the work:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cilkplus-
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Matt Godbolt wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply. I definitely have --enable-shared set in
>> the configuration, and had so with 4.7. However I'm not certain that
>> previously a system-installed libb
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Matt Godbolt wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. I definitely have --enable-shared set in
> the configuration, and had so with 4.7. However I'm not certain that
> previously a system-installed libbfd.so et al were causing my build to
> succeed (for the wrong re
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the quick reply. I definitely have --enable-shared set in
the configuration, and had so with 4.7. However I'm not certain that
previously a system-installed libbfd.so et al were causing my build to
succeed (for the wrong reason).
I'll try a build without --enable-shared and se
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Matt Godbolt wrote:
>
> I'm having trouble building the RC 4.8.0 with an in-tree binutils on
> an Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64. It seems that while building GCC, the runtime
> library path does not include the objdir/prev-*/.libs directories; so
> whenever any of the built
Hi all,
I'm having trouble building the RC 4.8.0 with an in-tree binutils on
an Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64. It seems that while building GCC, the runtime
library path does not include the objdir/prev-*/.libs directories; so
whenever any of the built binutils programs are run they fail as their
shared li
