On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm having trouble compiling sources adorned with the aligned
> attribute under Clang 3.1. Clang claims its GCC 4.2.1 compatible:
This is not a good list to ask this question as if clang claims to
4.2.1 compatible and is not the
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 18:12 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > I'll try your patch on some of my benchmarks and see what happens.
>
> Thanks.
When I removed mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc I didn't see any
differences, when I changed the ordering of REG_ALLOC_ORDER I saw
a savings of a few byte
Steve Ellcey writes:
> On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 22:28 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> FWIW, after seeing that, I tried the patch below. Disabling
>> ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER seemed to be a very mixed bag sizewise though --
>> certainly not the consistent win that I hoped -- and I wasn't set up to
>
Hello,
I am looking at how to correctly model in GCC predicate registers that have
more than one bit and the value set into to the predicate register after a
comparison depends on the size of the comparison.
I have looked into GCC backends but haven't really found any backend with a
similar co
