Re: Version specific onlinedocs page

2013-02-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote: I wonder if we could generate a version-specific page for the online documentation. I think that should be trivial to maintain and I know at least one vendor who would use it. If "we" means that you are volunteering ;-), absolutel

Re: Version specific onlinedocs page

2013-02-17 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote: > I wonder if we could generate a version-specific page for the online > documentation. I think that should be trivial to maintain and I know > at least one vendor who would use it. If "we" means that you are volunteering ;-), absolutely, go for it! Give

gcc-4.8-20130217 is now available

2013-02-17 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20130217 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20130217/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Version specific onlinedocs page

2013-02-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Dear all, hello Gerald, I wonder if we could generate a version-specific page for the online documentation. I think that should be trivial to maintain and I know at least one vendor who would use it. Namely, to place an "index.html" into, e.g., http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.2/ which

Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?

2013-02-17 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote: > There are technical details of the maintaining part - like would the > material reside in SVN? Or in the CVS where we keep our webpages? Or > somewhere else public (github?)? Would we want to have an official > maintainer and use the usual patch /

Re: make_decl_one_only and inlining

2013-02-17 Thread Jan Hubicka
> >> Set DECL_COMDAT. You said that didn't work but you didn't fully > >> explain why. A DECL_COMDAT function should be output in every object > >> file in which it is referenced. > > > > I wasn't sure if that's the correct approach. If it is, some > > further investigation will be necessary why

Re: make_decl_one_only and inlining

2013-02-17 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi, > > We recently got a bug report for the GCC D compiler frontend which shows that > we > currently don't inline any templated functions. The reason seems to be that > decl_replaceable_p always returns true for D template functions. > > We currently just mark such template function instance