On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Damian Rouson wrote:
> I'm interested in contributing to the gfortran compiler. Please send
> me any forms or instructions I need to follow regarding copyright
> assignment.
I sent the forms directly.
- David
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Damian Rouson wrote:
> I'm interested in contributing to the gfortran compiler. Please send
> me any forms or instructions I need to follow regarding copyright
> assignment.
http://www.fsf.org/volunteer
They will send you some forms you need to fill out and return
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20130208 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20130208/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 02/08/2013 09:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/24/2013 08:55 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I do see, however, a few areas where Clang/LLVM have gone that I do
not think GCC is currently thinking of entering: "toolability" (for
the lack of a better term). Clang's design follows a different path
On 01/24/2013 08:55 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I do see, however, a few areas where Clang/LLVM have gone that I do
not think GCC is currently thinking of entering: "toolability" (for
the lack of a better term). Clang's design follows a different path
than g++. It's not just a code generating par
I'm interested in contributing to the gfortran compiler. Please send
me any forms or instructions I need to follow regarding copyright
assignment.
Damian Rouson
+1-510-600-2992 (mobile)
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:46:04AM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:09 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> >>I've add pages comparing LLVM-3.2 and coming GCC 4.8 on
> >>http://vmakarov.fedorapeople.org/spec/.
> >>
> >>The pages ar
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
>> I have a GIMPLE_CALL statement and I want to mark the left-hand-side
>> value as being addressable (mark_addressable()). I am trying to force
>> the result to be stored on the stack, and
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
> I have a GIMPLE_CALL statement and I want to mark the left-hand-side
> value as being addressable (mark_addressable()). I am trying to force
> the result to be stored on the stack, and not in a register. I know
> the return of a call on an 64bi
