On 01/06/13 03:00, Gu, Forrest wrote:
Hi, Nathan,
I’ve seen your message with Qiong Cai on gcov link problem, from a mail of 19
Apr 2003…
gcov has changed a lot since then.
and you suggest to either:
a)add -fprofile-arcs
b)add -lgcov
However, I succeed with a) but fail with b), it prompt
On 4/01/2013, at 12:54 AM, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I like to contribute some patches to gcc. Therefor im asking kindly for the
> copyright assignment forms and advice.
Hi Rainer,
You need to forward your email to . It is the FSF, not the GCC
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20130106 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20130106/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
I'm obvkously doing something stupid here; but I'm at a loss to figure it out.
Porting to a machine where most instructions set some condition codes and
before hoisting, we have
(insn 1205 1204 1206 65 (set (reg:CC_ZN 24 *cc)
(compare:CC_ZN (reg:SI 843)
(reg:SI 844)))
../..
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:00 PM, pps . wrote:
> Question: How can I allocate random amount of stack space (using char
> arrays or alloca, and then align pointer to that stack space and
> reinterpret this chunk of memory as some structure that has some well
> defined layout that guarantees alignment
On 01/05/13 21:00, pps . wrote:
> Question: How can I allocate random amount of stack space (using char
> arrays or alloca, and then align pointer to that stack space and
> reinterpret this chunk of memory as some structure that has some well
> defined layout that guarantees alignment of certain
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 4:00 AM, pps . wrote:
> Question: How can I allocate random amount of stack space (using char
> arrays or alloca, and then align pointer to that stack space and
> reinterpret this chunk of memory as some structure that has some well
> defined layout that guarantees alignment
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Ye Joey wrote:
> In following example, call to sbfoo isn't a tail call with -O2. GCC
> analyzes local variable may be referenced in sbfoo. Is it a reasonable
> analysis? In another word, is it a legal program that bar stores
> address of local to a static variable,
In following example, call to sbfoo isn't a tail call with -O2. GCC
analyzes local variable may be referenced in sbfoo. Is it a reasonable
analysis? In another word, is it a legal program that bar stores
address of local to a static variable, and then for sbfoo to access
it?
This issue cause a mis
