-Forwarded message-
From: ETANI NORIKO
To: iant
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:34:48 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: [RE-SENDING]Re: MCSoC2013: to enhance embedded Linux for many-core
system
Dear Sir,
I would like to add my explanation to my former e-mail.
>>The reason why GCC is not available f
-Forwarded message-
From: ETANI NORIKO
To: iant
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:26:34 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [RE-SENDING]Re: MCSoC2013: to enhance embedded Linux for many-core
system
Dear Sir,
Thank you for replying my e-mail.
This is an implementation issue for OpenCL or parallel computing
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:12:43AM +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Konstantin Serebryany a écrit:
>
> > When we have a code like X++ (either RMW, or a regular increment) it
> > is enough for asan to instrument it just once (either as a read or a
> > write, doesn't matter).
> > LLVM implementation
Konstantin Serebryany a écrit:
> When we have a code like X++ (either RMW, or a regular increment) it
> is enough for asan to instrument it just once (either as a read or a
> write, doesn't matter).
> LLVM implementation does this optimization for regular increments,
> while GCC does not (yet).
>
