Like this. Tested on powerpc-linux and installed as obvious.
Andreas.
* include/Makefile.am (${host_builddir}/c++config.h): Replace
[] by [].
* include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am b/libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am
index 44200ee
Richard Sandiford writes:
> On the face of it, plain:
>
> "%{mtestoption:-mcpu=cortex-a5 %
> ought to be OK. mtestoption will get passed down the cc1 etc., but
> adding it to the .opt file should mean that it is accepted and ignored.
Er, I meant "%{mtestoption:-mcpu=cortex-a5}".
Richard
gnubie gnubie writes:
> Hi,
>
> I notice that if you add a DRIVER_SELF_SPEC option and then add that
> option as a MULTILIB_OPTION, it doesn't build certain libraries for
> that multilib variant.
>
> for example, if you add:
>
> "%{mtestoption:-mcpu=cortex-a5 %
> (and then define mtestoption in th
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:50 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 14 May 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>>> > As a minor nitpick, I have always used x32 with a lower case x. The
>>> > capital X32 looks odd to me.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I used X32 togeth
Hello everybody,
I am modifying GCC for inserting a new OpenMP pragma. This pragma has a
clause that accepts a MYVAR (integer), and modifies its value. It behaves
more or less as a PARALLEL pragma, except that the return value of the
inserted function call is assigned to MYVAR. However, I never m
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Steven Bosscher writes:
>
>> Fixed with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=194152
>
> I think if you had changed to it would have a
> better chance to survive broken editors.
I only put back what was there before. To be hones
Steven Bosscher writes:
> Fixed with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=194152
I think if you had changed to it would have a
better chance to survive broken editors.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D
Steven Bosscher writes:
> Looks like someone used a broken editor replacing tabs with spaces:
Rather the other way round.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Someone broke bootstrap on powerpc64-linux between r194084 and
>> r194141. Anyone else seeing this?
>>
>> Ciao!
>> Steven
>
> Looks like someone used a broken editor repla
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone broke bootstrap on powerpc64-linux between r194084 and
> r194141. Anyone else seeing this?
>
> Ciao!
> Steven
Looks like someone used a broken editor replacing tabs with spaces:
2012-12-03 Benjamin Kosnik
* i
Hello,
Someone broke bootstrap on powerpc64-linux between r194084 and
r194141. Anyone else seeing this?
Ciao!
Steven
../../../../../trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale-inst.cc:338:8:
error: 'void
_ZNKSt7num_getIcSt19istreambuf_iteratorIcSt11char_traitsIcEEE14_M_extract_intItEES3_S3_S3_RSt8ios
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if the next release of GCC will support the openACC
> directives. At the moment only commercial compilers support the openACC
> standard.
No, it won't.
Richard.
> Thank you
> Salvatore
>
Hi,
I would like to know if the next release of GCC will support the openACC
directives. At the moment only commercial compilers support the openACC
standard.
Thank you
Salvatore
13 matches
Mail list logo
