Hello,
That looks interesting thanks for pointing that out.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 12:19 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Alexey Kravets wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > I am looking for a way to implement source annota
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 12:19 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Alexey Kravets wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am looking for a way to implement source annotation (or something
> > similar) for a for loops. Basically, I need some mechanism to mark
> > certain for loops in the s
On 12/03/2012 11:29 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 12/03/2012 04:54 PM, Nolen, Steven D wrote:
In the c++11 headers for the random number generation (random.h), the
function "discard" for the linear_congruential has been implemented
in a very inefficient manner.
As I mentioned when we optimiz
Is the lack of replies a sign that I missed to explain something in my email?
Cheers,
Paulo Matos
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Paulo
> Matos
> Sent: 29 November 2012 17:04
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Failure to vecto
Hi,
On 12/03/2012 04:54 PM, Nolen, Steven D wrote:
In the c++11 headers for the random number generation (random.h), the function
"discard" for the linear_congruential has been implemented in a very
inefficient manner.
As I mentioned when we optimized a while ago the discard member function
f
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Nolen, Steven D wrote:
> In the c++11 headers for the random number generation (random.h), the
> function "discard" for the linear_congruential has been implemented in a very
> inefficient manner. Many modern Monte Carlo codes require this function to
> work ef
On 03/12/2012 03:09, Kenny Simpson wrote:
From http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html, I see that this seems to
be the only major core-language feature missing from c++11 support.
And from http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html I see that clang does
support it.
I see the note saying that it was b
In the c++11 headers for the random number generation (random.h), the function
"discard" for the linear_congruential has been implemented in a very
inefficient manner. Many modern Monte Carlo codes require this function to
work efficiently across large strides through the random number stream.
I've committed rev 194091. It brings all the changes to trunk
from last week.
I will be doing weekly merges from trunk into the branch. To
avoid unnecessary spam, I won't announce merges unless something
interesting happens.
Tested on x86_64.
Diego.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Alexey Kravets wrote:
> Hello,
> I am looking for a way to implement source annotation (or something
> similar) for a for loops. Basically, I need some mechanism to mark
> certain for loops in the source code for the GIMPLE optimization
> passes (for C/C++ only cur
Hello,
I am looking for a way to implement source annotation (or something
similar) for a for loops. Basically, I need some mechanism to mark
certain for loops in the source code for the GIMPLE optimization
passes (for C/C++ only currently).
For example something like this:
int i;
__attribute__((m
11 matches
Mail list logo
