Re: Dependences for call-preserved regs on exposed pipeline target?

2012-11-26 Thread Greg McGary
On 11/26/12 12:46, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > I wonder if "kludgy fixups" refers to the dummy-instruction solution I > mentioned above. The complete dependence graph is a myth. You cannot have a > complete dependence graph for a function -- scheduler works on DAG regions > (and I doubt it will e

Re: embedded Linux: improvement issues

2012-11-26 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
On 27/11/2012, at 4:51 PM, ETANI NORIKO wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > > I am researching the status quo of embedded Linux and find out your website > of "Embedded Linux Conference 2013". We are looking for the engineer at a > distributor side in order to consult our implementation issues and improve

Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon

2012-11-26 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
Richard, I spent a good part of the afternoon talking to Mike about this. He is on the c++ standards committee and is a much more seasoned c++ programmer than I am. He convinced me that with a large amount of engineering and c++ "foolishness" that it was indeed possible to get your proposal

Re: GCC 4.7.2 error handling type short

2012-11-26 Thread Paul_Koning
On Nov 26, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Bill Beech (NJ7P) wrote: > I have run into a problem with both 4.6.1 and 4.7.2 of the gcc compiler > handling type short. Sizeof(unsigned short) returns a length of 2 as > expected, but when I use a union of a character buffer and some fields > including a unsigne

GCC 4.7.2 error handling type short

2012-11-26 Thread Bill Beech (NJ7P)
I have run into a problem with both 4.6.1 and 4.7.2 of the gcc compiler handling type short. Sizeof(unsigned short) returns a length of 2 as expected, but when I use a union of a character buffer and some fields including a unsigned short the value returned is 2 bytes but the buffer pointer is

Re: Hash table iterators.

2012-11-26 Thread Lawrence Crowl
On 11/23/12, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > On 11/22/2012 01:18 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > > I have found that tree-flow.h implements iteration over htab_t, > > while there is no current facility to do that with hash_table. > > Unfortunately, the specific form does not match the standard C++ > > approac

Re: Dependences for call-preserved regs on exposed pipeline target?

2012-11-26 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
On 27/11/2012, at 4:34 AM, Greg McGary wrote: > On 11/25/12 23:33, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >> You essentially need a fix-up pass just before the end of compilation >> (machine-dependent reorg, if memory serves me right) to space instructions >> consuming values from CPRs from the CALL_INSNS that s

Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC)

2012-11-26 Thread DJ Delorie
> Marketing loves high numbers after all! If you truly think this way, we're going to have to revoke your hacker's license ;-)

Re: RFC - Alternatives to gengtype

2012-11-26 Thread Diego Novillo
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >> >>> I'd say the most pragmatic solution is to stick with gengtype but >>> make it more dependent on annotations (thus,

Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon

2012-11-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > On 11/26/2012 10:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kenneth Zadeck >> wrote: >>> >>> On 11/04/2012 11:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:

Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon

2012-11-26 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
On 11/26/2012 10:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: On 11/04/2012 11:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: Kenneth Zadeck writes: I would like you to respond to at least point 1 of this email.

Re: Dependences for call-preserved regs on exposed pipeline target?

2012-11-26 Thread Greg McGary
On 11/25/12 23:33, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > You essentially need a fix-up pass just before the end of compilation > (machine-dependent reorg, if memory serves me right) to space instructions > consuming values from CPRs from the CALL_INSNS that set those CPRs. I.e., > for the 99% of compilation

Re: Unused field in graphds.h struct graph?

2012-11-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > In graphds.h, struct graph has a field "htab_t indices". > As near as I can tell, it is completely unused. It builds > and tests fine with the field #if'd out. > > Shall I remove the field? Sure. Please make sure to have graphite enabled

Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon

2012-11-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > > On 11/04/2012 11:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Richard Sandiford >> wrote: >>> >>> Kenneth Zadeck writes: I would like you to respond to at least point 1 of this email. In it there is

The Linux binutils 2.23.51.0.6 is released

2012-11-26 Thread H.J. Lu
This is the beta release of binutils 2.23.51.0.6 for Linux, which is based on binutils 2012 1123 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various changes. It is purely for Linux. All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree. You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been

Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists?

2012-11-26 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:12:17PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: > > In this day and age of rich-text capable mailers, restricting postings > > to be text-only seems quaint and antiquated. Are there any hard > > requirements that force u