Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10

2012-11-11 Thread Dennis Clarke
> On 11 November 2012 21:57, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > Here is what I did with gmp : > > > > $ ls $SRC/gmp* > > /usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2 > > > > $ /opt/schily/bin/star -x -bz -xdir -xdot -U -fs=16m > > file=/usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2 > > star: 1262 blocks + 0 bytes (total of 12922880

Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10

2012-11-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 11 November 2012 21:57, Dennis Clarke wrote: > Here is what I did with gmp : > > $ ls $SRC/gmp* > /usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2 > > $ /opt/schily/bin/star -x -bz -xdir -xdot -U -fs=16m > file=/usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2 > star: 1262 blocks + 0 bytes (total of 12922880 bytes = 12620.00k)

gcc-4.8-20121111 is now available

2012-11-11 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.8-2012 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-2012/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10

2012-11-11 Thread Dennis Clarke
> > What isn't clear is where that is run. I decided that I will take your > > approach and try to follow the magic incantations to the very > letter. OKay, > > sort of. I may expand on the CFLAGS just a little bit and I have to > assume, > > in the absence of any data, that I shall run these "c

Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10

2012-11-11 Thread Eric Botcazou
> What isn't clear is where that is run. I decided that I will take your > approach and try to follow the magic incantations to the very letter. OKay, > sort of. I may expand on the CFLAGS just a little bit and I have to assume, > in the absence of any data, that I shall run these "config ; make; m

Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10

2012-11-11 Thread Dennis Clarke
> > The last (very annoying) issue is that when gcc bootstraps itself, the > > freshly-built compiler doesn't generate 64-bit binaries by default. > > BOOT_CFLAGS can work around that: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html. > > That isn't true at all. okay .. I'll just nod my head and agree. >

Re: Time for GCC 5.0? (TIC)

2012-11-11 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/11/2012 04:47 AM, NightStrike wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 11/10/2012 04:45 AM, NightStrike wrote: >>> Making c99 the default for gcc would be a great candidate for this. >>> IIUC, gcc without -std=c99 will compile for c89. And if I read the >>> manual

Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10

2012-11-11 Thread Dennis Clarke
> > The last (very annoying) issue is that when gcc bootstraps itself, the > > freshly-built compiler doesn't generate 64-bit binaries by default. > > BOOT_CFLAGS can work around that: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html. > > That isn't true at all. > > > CC='cc -m64' CXX='CC -m64' ../gmp-5.0.

Re: the struggle to create a 64-bit gcc on Solaris 10

2012-11-11 Thread Eric Botcazou
> The last (very annoying) issue is that when gcc bootstraps itself, the > freshly-built compiler doesn't generate 64-bit binaries by default. > BOOT_CFLAGS can work around that: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html. That isn't true at all. > CC='cc -m64' CXX='CC -m64' ../gmp-5.0.1-src/configure