On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
>>> has been modifying the compiler in the meantime
On 32-bit sparc with LRA enabled we have the following (this
generated for gcc.dg/vect/pr51581-4.c with -flto):
(insn 252 142 165 4 (set (reg:HI 234 [ D.1511 ])
(mem/c:HI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 1307)
(const_int 24 [0x18])) [4 b+24 S2 A64])) test.c:23 59
{*movhi_insn}
(ex
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 11:02 +1100, Clinton Mead wrote:
> Hi All
>
> This is a feature request. To explain, lets say I want to create a
> TriBool type, like so:
>
> enum TriBool { False, True, Unknown };
>
> I now want to implement operator&&. I want operator&& to short
> circuit, i.e. if the fir
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> I see that --with-multilib-list= is an option for AMD64 and SH. Are
> there plans or patches for mips? Otherwise, have there been any
> developments that will allow me to configure to build only n32 and
> n64?
I created my own s
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Matt Turner wrote:
>
>> I say this mail http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-01/msg00063.html
>> suggesting the addition of a --multilib= configure option. Has such a
>> thing been added? Is there a way to configure gcc to bu
Hi All
This is a feature request. To explain, lets say I want to create a
TriBool type, like so:
enum TriBool { False, True, Unknown };
I now want to implement operator&&. I want operator&& to short
circuit, i.e. if the first argument is False the second argument
shouldn't be evaluated.
So I'll
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20121103 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20121103/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
I have realized that it would be real useful to know which fixinclude fixes
are actually in use so that old cruft can get retired. Since nobody at all
has direct access to all the actively maintained platforms, it makes it
difficult to know. Therefore, it seems reasonable to me to jigger up some
On 11/03/2012 12:41 PM, Tim Prince wrote:
On 11/3/2012 3:32 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such
file or directory
which also prevents me from compiling the compiler under Fedora 17.
This means that I am both not able to compile progra
On 11/3/2012 3:32 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such
file or directory
which also prevents me from compiling the compiler under Fedora 17.
This means that I am both not able to compile programs in 32-bit mode
and help you with the co
Hi, all
I do the research of min max instructions recently. I find it is related with
phiopt.
case1:
int foo(short a ,short b)
{
if (a < b)
a = b;
return a;
}
It is successed in pass phiopt1(-O2 with gcc 4.7.0). The MAX_EXPR can be
generated.
foo (short int a, short int b)
{
int D
On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
has been modifying the compiler in the meantime such that arguments are now
passed in xmm registers instead of over the s
On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
has been modifying the compiler in the meantime such that arguments are now
passed in xmm registers instead of over the s
13 matches
Mail list logo
