Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 18 October 2012 23:08, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > As you are improving the bug reporting documentation: I'm not changing the documentation. I'm just trying to make some existing text harder to ignore. > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ > > does not explain how to report a bug that only occurs with LT

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Jonathan Wakely schrieb: On 18 October 2012 13:43, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 18 October 2012 13:32, Frédéric Buclin wrote: Le 18. 10. 12 14:27, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : I'll prepare some mockups for people to look at and see if they like it. Please file a bug and CC me. It's much easier to t

Re: testing that a Gimple call argument is a string...

2012-10-18 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 22:33 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > Hello > > I'm coding in MELT the ex06/ of https://github.com/bstarynk/melt-examples/ > which should typecheck calls to variadic functions json_pack & json_unpack > from http://www.digip.org/jansson (a JSON library in C). > > I'm wor

testing that a Gimple call argument is a string...

2012-10-18 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello I'm coding in MELT the ex06/ of https://github.com/bstarynk/melt-examples/ which should typecheck calls to variadic functions json_pack & json_unpack from http://www.digip.org/jansson (a JSON library in C). I'm working on a MELT pass on Gimple/SSA after phiopt (maybe that place is wrong?)

Re: Inconsistency between code and docs

2012-10-18 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Paulo Matos wrote: > > I have found a strange inconsistency between code and docs for > TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION. > > Docs say > (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/gccint/File-Framework.html#index-TARGET_005fASM_005fNAMED_005fSECTION-4472): > " If decl is n

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > That PR now has a link to a mocked up bugzilla page: > http://www.kayari.plus.com/gcc/enter_bug.cgi-1.html which I think > would be a significant improvement, without getting in the way or > being an eyesore. > > Do any other maintainers

Re: New dump infrastructure

2012-10-18 Thread Sharad Singhai
> You still have the issue that // regular stuff may appear to possibly > clobber any_dump_enabled_p and thus repeated any_dump_enabled_p > checks are not optimized by the compiler (we don't have predicated > value-numbering (yet)). > So I prefer the guard. I suppose after this discussion I prefe

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 18 October 2012 13:43, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 18 October 2012 13:32, Frédéric Buclin wrote: >> Le 18. 10. 12 14:27, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : >>> I'll prepare some mockups for people to look at and see if they like it. >> >> Please file a bug and CC me. It's much easier to track progress in

Re: New dump infrastructure

2012-10-18 Thread Xinliang David Li
sounds good. thanks, David On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Xinliang David Li >>> wrote: A more simpler us

Inconsistency between code and docs

2012-10-18 Thread Paulo Matos
Hello, I have found a strange inconsistency between code and docs for TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION. Docs say (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/gccint/File-Framework.html#index-TARGET_005fASM_005fNAMED_005fSECTION-4472): " If decl is non-NULL, it is the VAR_DECL or FUNCTION_DECL with which th

cse_process_notes_1 issue ?

2012-10-18 Thread Aurelien Buhrig
Hi, I'm trying to track a bug down on a private backend which occurs during CSE pass (gcc-4.6.3, pr27364.c). In the following RTL, the hardware (reg:HI r2), whose natural mode is HImode, is set to 0, but when analysing the REG_EQUAL notes of the MULT insn during CSE pass, the (reg:SI r2) is compu

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 18 October 2012 13:32, Frédéric Buclin wrote: > Le 18. 10. 12 14:27, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : >> I'll prepare some mockups for people to look at and see if they like it. > > Please file a bug and CC me. It's much easier to track progress in > Bugzilla than per email. OK, thanks, it's now PR 54

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Frédéric Buclin
Le 18. 10. 12 14:27, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : > I'll prepare some mockups for people to look at and see if they like it. Please file a bug and CC me. It's much easier to track progress in Bugzilla than per email. LpSolit

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 18 October 2012 13:16, Frédéric Buclin wrote: > Le 18. 10. 12 14:06, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : >> Other bugzillas I've used have a big red text box that very >> prominently tells the submitted to search for existing bugs. > > Do you have an example of such Bugzillas? Mozilla and RedHat have no >

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Frédéric Buclin
Le 18. 10. 12 14:06, Jonathan Wakely a écrit : > Other bugzillas I've used have a big red text box that very > prominently tells the submitted to search for existing bugs. Do you have an example of such Bugzillas? Mozilla and RedHat have no such big red box. KDE has something closer. > I'd do it

Re: Bugzilla new bug page

2012-10-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 11 May 2011 15:05, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Can we increase the size of the text at the top of the Enter Bug page? > > "Before reporting a bug, please read the bug writing guidelines, > please look at the list of most frequently reported bugs, and please > search for the bug." > > It's not very

Re: New dump infrastructure

2012-10-18 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Xinliang David Li >> wrote: >>> A more simpler use model is not to guard the dump statement at all -- >>> just express the intention a) what t