On 12-10-15 7:14 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Hi Vlad,
While browsing through old yara/ira patches, I came across this patch
of yours from several years ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01625.html
That work was in your IRA presentation at the GCC summit in 2007, and
it was also
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the AArch64 port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Richard Earnshaw and Marcus Shawcroft as co-maintainers.
Happy hacking!
David
On 2012-10-15 13:21 , Lawrence Crowl wrote:
Given this, and that the other bitmap interfaces mostly return a
changed flag, we should opt for the simpler API, always returning
it. That includes the few remaining bitmap.h functions that
aren't already doing so.
Does anyone have objections to th
On 10/15/12, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > > > I have no problem in always returning a status change,
> > > > if you are OK with that.
> > >
> > > I am ok with that.
> >
> > There is some rationale for being concerned about performance,
> > as the checking ro
On 15 October 2012 18:14, Ахриев Альберт wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It appears that operator[] in STL containers (e.g. vector, deque) does not
> check bounds any more (g++ 4.7.2).
If you want to discuss the C++ library then you should mail the
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org list.
> Two-three generations ago g+
Hi All,
It appears that operator[] in STL containers (e.g. vector, deque) does not
check bounds any more (g++ 4.7.2).
Two-three generations ago g++ was very cautious about consistency checking but
not now.
I would appeal to developers to reconsider this pretty tough decision.
I have recently
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > > I have no problem in always returning a status change, if you are OK
> > > with that.
> >
> > I am ok with that.
>
> There is some rationale for being concerned about performance, as the
> checking routines need to read memory locations that
Hi,
If you look at them more closely, you will see that the two different
macro's give different answers to the same problem.
If you like, I will retry at gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org, although I suppose
binut...@sourceware.org should be having a copy too.
Thanks,
Mischa.
On 10/13/2012 02:03 AM, J
Hello Steven,
Steven Bosscher wrote:
Can someone please add a BZ keyword for the C11/C++11 memory model? I
think it would be good to tag missed-optimizations or wrong-code bugs
for the memory model with such a special keyword to have a BZ search
find them quickly.
Adding a keyword is simple, i
