On 08/30/12 15:39, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello Everyone,
The Cilk-Plus branch is feature-complete. Programs using Cilk Plus
constructs get great performance on vector and multicore hardware. Programs
that don't use the new language features (enabled by a -fcilkplus flag) see no
change.
Hello All,
Do you maybe know how to find out (in legitimize_pic_address() and in
arm_assemble_integer()) whether an address (rtx) is in text/rodata or in data?
Maybe something like MEM_READONLY_P()? (But I don't know how to apply this to
an rtx ...)
That is for "read-only position independenc
On 9/3/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > To take full advantage of the conversion to C++, we will need to use
>
> I'm not sure what "full advantage" of single-inheritance vs. composition
> is.
You get automatic pointer-to-base-class conversion with single
i
On 8/31/12, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
GRAMMAR
Support adding a second discriminator. This support is not for
multiple inheritance, but for single inheritance when a second
discriminator is used to further refine it. Look at struct
tree_omp_clause. It contains a sub
Segher and I are planning to remove the machinery supporting
RS6000_CALL_GLUE. In the AIX ABI, used by AIX, PowerOpen, PPC64 Linux
and mcall-aixdesc, direct calls to named functions that may be
external are followed by a special no-op instruction that the linker
can replace with an instruction to
Yes, I downloaded a GCC 4.6.3 and it seem to go well thus far.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
>-Original Message-
>From: Diego Novillo [mailto:dnovi...@google.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:03 PM
>To: Iyer, Balaji V
>Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: Trunk Build errors
>
>On Tue, Se
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> I am getting the following error when I am trying to build the trunk
> on x86_64 SuSE Linux. My SVN head is at revision 190930. Is anyone else
> finding this?
It's happening with a g++ 4.3 host compiler, right?
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 1:05 PM
> To: Selvaraj, Senthil_Kumar
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [AVR] Target specific regression test causes virtual memory
> exhaustion
>
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
> > On a 64 bit machin
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Also, on at least powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (a primary platform) and
> sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu and probably others (PR54453). The breakage
> is caused by drepper's patches at r190783 and r190787. The breakage
> on powerpc64 is now almost a week old
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> I am getting the following error when I am trying to build the trunk
> on x86_64 SuSE Linux. My SVN head is at revision 190930. Is anyone else
> finding this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
>
Hello Everyone,
I am getting the following error when I am trying to build the trunk on
x86_64 SuSE Linux. My SVN head is at revision 190930. Is anyone else finding
this?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
=
Hello,
Bootstrap is currently broken on x86 targets with binutils 2.20 (from
2009) and older (PR54419) because the rdrand instruction is emitted
but that instruction is only supported in binutils 2.21 and later.
This means bootstrap is broken on almost all x86_64 machines in the
compile farm for e
12 matches
Mail list logo
