Re: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

Hi hp, thanks for the notes, I'm just going to highlight my point of view. Regarding patch pinging, my take is that is should be seldom necessary, for example I tend to forget my small patches after sometime. So IMHO anyone replying anything is good, especially if he CCs the maintainer (Dodji-

Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

On a whim I hosted a BOF at the GNU tools cauldron yesterday, titled "pending patches" (no compliance with RFC5434 intended). This was originally only out of egotistic motives: BUMPing the "Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure, revisited" patch at

Re: gcc plugin problem

Thanks. The problem was naming indeed. I managed to recompile gcc with c compiler only and the problem is gone. On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > mahdi hamzeh skribis: > >> I compiled and built gcc 4.7.0 myself. I am not sure if I build gcc on >> my machine, it wou

Re: gcc-4.8-20120708 is now available

On Mon, 8 Jul 2012, gccad...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: Snapshot gcc-4.8-20120708 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20120708/ Any idea who's responsible for this massive decrease in memory usage? :-) Valgrind's massif isn't really helping me to track this one. See the "mem

Re: gcc plugin problem

Hi, mahdi hamzeh skribis: > I compiled and built gcc 4.7.0 myself. I am not sure if I build gcc on > my machine, it would be compiled as c++. How would I check that? You could run: nm /path/to/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/cc1 | \ grep loop_optimizer_init and check whether

Re: [Mpc-discuss] GNU MPC 1.0 release candidate

- Original Message - From: "Andreas Enge" To: ; Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 5:12 PM Subject: Re: [Mpc-discuss] GNU MPC 1.0 release candidate Hi Rob, thanks for your report. Math::MPC (perl) no longer builds against this library because of undefined references to 'mpc_mul_2exp' a

Re: G++ namespace association extension

On 07/09/2012 01:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Namespace-Association.html says: "Caution: The semantics of this extension are not fully defined. Users should refrain from using this extension as its semantics may change subtly over time. It is possible that this

G++ namespace association extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Namespace-Association.html says: "Caution: The semantics of this extension are not fully defined. Users should refrain from using this extension as its semantics may change subtly over time. It is possible that this extension will be removed in future versions of

Re: [Mpc-discuss] GNU MPC 1.0 release candidate

Hi Rob, thanks for your report. > Math::MPC (perl) no longer builds against this library because of undefined > references to 'mpc_mul_2exp' and 'mpc_div_2exp'. > Looks like those functions are no longer present - which doesn't bother me > greatly. They have been renamed to mpc_mul_2ui and mpc