Brett Foster writes:
> 1) How to marking a node as visited by my algorithm (without screwing
> up the compiler!)
Use a pointer_set.
> 2) How to associate additional data (perhaps a pointer to something
> else) to a node (like a unique identifier, or a pointer to a data
> structure).
Use a poin
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 June 2012 01:30, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>>
>> After reading up further, it appears that the possibility exists that the
>> script may 'fix' things in the libc headers that we don't want or need
>> 'fixed'. I'm trying to ascertain what t
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20120603 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20120603/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Klaus Pedersen writes:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> On 05/28/2012 03:09 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>
>>> Klaus Pedersen writes:
The summery goes something like this:
It is possible for the second pass of ira to get confused and decide that
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 4.7 branch is in regression and documentation fixes only state.
>
> A release candidate for GCC 4.7.1 is scheduled for the beginning of
> next week. This is a good time to verify regression status for
> your
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 03:09 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
>> Klaus Pedersen writes:
>>>
>>> The summery goes something like this:
>>>
>>> It is possible for the second pass of ira to get confused and decide that
>>> NO_REGS or a hard float regi
On Jun 3, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> It's trivial to let it run and compare the fixed files to the
> originals. On my system with a recent glibc I still see lots of
> changes to limits.h, I assume they're not pointless and are worth
> having.
I believe that gcc always supplies an
On 3 June 2012 01:46, Gmail wrote:
> Lemmings,
> What is the point of putting such an immense list of fragments of the manual
> online? What if we loose out internet? Do you hate the thought of making one
> whole file containing the whole manual available because no one else does it
> that way? Are
On 3 June 2012 01:30, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> After reading up further, it appears that the possibility exists that the
> script may 'fix' things in the libc headers that we don't want or need
> 'fixed'. I'm trying to ascertain what things the script in particular is
> 'fixing' and which way is
> There have been discussions about the need (or lack of) for this script
> to run on the Linux From Scratch development list. In LFS gcc is
> bootstrapped in a very confined chroot environment where the only
> headers available are the Linux headers and those from glibc. What is in
> question is w
10 matches
Mail list logo
