Hi,
I belong to HP-UX Itanium/PA-RISC GCC compiler team. I noticed that the GCC
page (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html) that lists out the
pre-compiled versions of GCC (for different platforms) does not contain the
web link of "GCC for HP-UX 11i". Please let me know the procedure to get
I would like to make a contribution to gcc. What copyright assignment paperwork
do I need to do this and what do I need to get from my employer?
Thank you.
Josh Cogliati
The core development team is pleased to announce the availability
of PPL 0.12.1, a new release of the Parma Polyhedra Library.
This release includes portability improvements, a couple of new
minor features, some interface changes and an important bug fix
concerning the PIP solver.
The precise li
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > > inline int syscall1(int number, long arg1) {
> > > register int ax __asm__("eax");
> > > register long di __asm__("rdi");
> > > ax = number;
> > > di = arg1;
> > > __asm__ volatile ("syscall");
> >
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 04:11 +0800, Chiheng Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chiheng Xu wrote:
> >
> > And I want to say that tree/gimple/rtl are compiler's data(or state),
> > not compiler's text(or logic), the most important thing about them is
> > how to access their fields.
> >
>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:33 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch for x86-64 psABI adds document for STT_GNU_IFUNC and
> R_X86_64_IRELATIVE. It has been implemented on Linux/x86-64 for
> more than a year. Please add it to x86-64 psABI.
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi Michael,
Can you apply IFUNC spec to x8
On 16 April 2012 10:36, Chiheng Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
>> hand, but to suggest banning all templates is not a supportable
>> notion.
>>
>
> Why ?
Because they're useful.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
> hand, but to suggest banning all templates is not a supportable
> notion.
>
Why ?
--
Chiheng Xu
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>>> And I want to say that tree/gimple/rtl are compiler's data(or state),
>>> not compiler's text(or logic), the most important thing about them is
>>> how to access their fields.
>>>
>>
>> Given the above assumption, now I doubt the necessity o
On 16 April 2012 08:11, Diego Ongaro wrote:
> Hi all,
Questions about using GCC should go to the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org list,
not this one.
> I was working on some C++11 template hacks to be able to pass C++ objects to a
> function wrapping printf. What I want to do looks like this, where convert
>
And I want to say that tree/gimple/rtl are compiler's data(or state),
not compiler's text(or logic), the most important thing about them is
how to access their fields.
Given the above assumption, now I doubt the necessity of accessor
macros or C++ getter/setter method.
Is "tree->code" more dir
Hi all,
I was working on some C++11 template hacks to be able to pass C++ objects to a
function wrapping printf. What I want to do looks like this, where convert
might do fancy things like create string representations of objects:
template
void Printf(const char* format, Args&&... args)
{
pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
