Snapshot gcc-4.5-20120301 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20120301/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
The GNU Compiler Collection version 4.6.3 has been released.
GCC 4.6.3 is a bug-fix release containing fixes for regressions and serious
bugs in GCC 4.6.2, with over 70 bugs fixed since previous release. This
release is available from the FTP servers listed at:
http://www.gnu.org/order/ftp.htm
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> Second point, as you said, PRE often get confused and moves compare
>>> EXPR far from jump statement. Could we rely on register re-materialize
>>> to handle this, or any other solution?
>>
>> Well, a simple kind of solution would be to preproces
>> Second point, as you said, PRE often get confused and moves compare
>> EXPR far from jump statement. Could we rely on register re-materialize
>> to handle this, or any other solution?
>
> Well, a simple kind of solution would be to preprocess the IL before
> redundancy elimination and separate t
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it has been quiet around Graphite for a while and I think it is more than
> time to give an update on Graphite.
>
> == The Status of Graphite ==
>
> Graphite has been around for a while in GCC. During this time a lot of
> people teste
Le 01/03/2012 11:09, Richard Guenther a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Aurelien Buhrig
> wrote:
>> Le 29/02/2012 17:08, Richard Guenther a écrit :
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Aurelien Buhrig
>>> wrote:
Le 29/02/2012 16:15, Richard Guenther a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 29,
Hi,
I am supporting custom 32-bit backend for gcc 4.6.2, and I want to
implement DI to DF conversion. Earlier it was through libgcc. Specific
of backend is, that DF may be represented as one register, but source
DI must be splitted into two SI to be used.
So overall insn pattern (actual splitting
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Aurelien Buhrig
wrote:
> Le 29/02/2012 17:08, Richard Guenther a écrit :
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Aurelien Buhrig
>> wrote:
>>> Le 29/02/2012 16:15, Richard Guenther a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Aurelien Buhrig
wrote:
>
