On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Paul S wrote:
> Thanks Dave,
>
> I would never have guessed from gccinternals.pdf that it is possible to use
> mode iterators to select predicates & constraints ...
Really? If you but if you have suggestions for improving the
documentation, that'd be welcome.
> I think I hav
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Douglas Rupp wrote:
> If it please the Committee: I volunteer as the Interix maintainer.
You forgot to attach two passport photos and your credit card
information for the processing fee, Douglas, but we can attend
to that later. :-)
On a more serious note, I'm taking care of
On 01/18/2012 08:20 AM, Jed Davis wrote:
> But my other question is: is there interest in having this change
> contributed? It's not inherently vendor-specific, but I'm having trouble
> thinking of anyone else who'd want to use it, and I don't know what GCC's
> policy is on features like that.
It
On 01/18/2012 08:16 AM, Paul S wrote:
> Thanks H-P,
>
> That worked first time !
>
> For a few days I had been searching the non cc0 ports for hints. Two
> of the ports don't bother using the set CC side effect to avoid
> compares and the others are obfuscated by the fact that they
> (understanda
If it please the Committee: I volunteer as the Interix maintainer.
--Douglas Rupp
Thanks Dave,
I would never have guessed from gccinternals.pdf that it is possible to
use mode iterators to select predicates & constraints ... I think I have
a use for this today :-)
Cheers, Paul.
On 20/01/12 10:26, Dave Korn wrote:
On 17/01/2012 21:16, Paul S wrote:
For example the i
Hello All,
It is my pleasure to announce the release candidate 2 of MELT plugin 0.9.3 for
GCC 4.6 (&
4.7 when available)
Please download the gzipped tar archive from
http://gcc-melt.org/melt-0.9.3rc2-plugin-for-gcc-4.6.tgz
(file of 4231496 bytes of md5sum 970024b88e82357fe1440eb767c6f07a)
This i
On 22 January 2012 11:34, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-01-21 13:58:53 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 21 January 2012 13:42, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> > On 2012-01-21 01:24:19 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> >> And what about the fact other compilers haven't defined such a macro
>> >> for
On 2012-01-21 13:58:53 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21 January 2012 13:42, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2012-01-21 01:24:19 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >> And what about the fact other compilers haven't defined such a macro
> >> for each extension they implement, whether it comes from GC
