> From: Terry Guo
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 04:25:46 +0100
> I plan to set up daily regression test on trunk for target
> ARM-NONE-EABI and post results to gcc-testresults mailing
> list.
Nice. I see others do it for that target, but apparently not
for a pristine tree (the results having many fa
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Terry Guo writes:
>
>> I plan to set up daily regression test on trunk for target
>> ARM-NONE-EABI and post results to gcc-testresults mailing list. Which
>> Binutils should I use, the Binutils trunk or the latest released
>> Binutils? A
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20111222 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20111222/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Gary Funck wrote:
> On 12/06/11 01:18:28, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > [...] It still seems reasonable to aim for
> > entering Stage 4 (regression fixes and documentation changes only) in
> > early January and the 4.7.0 release in March or April.
>
> At what point in time would
On 12/06/11 01:18:28, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> [...] It still seems reasonable to aim for
> entering Stage 4 (regression fixes and documentation changes only) in
> early January and the 4.7.0 release in March or April.
At what point in time would the GCC 4.7 branch be created,
and the trunk would
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Jiangning Liu wrote:
>> Yes, the number of iterations of the i loop simply is too difficult fo
>> our loop iteration calculator to comprehend:
>>
>> for (i=k; i<500; i+=k)
>>
>> iterates for roundup((500-k)/k) time. In particular if the step is
>> non-constant o
> Yes, the number of iterations of the i loop simply is too difficult for
> our loop iteration calculator to comprehend:
>
> for (i=k; i<500; i+=k)
>
> iterates for roundup((500-k)/k) time. In particular if the step is
> non-constant our nr-of-iteration calculator gives up.
>
I'm trying to g
