¿ÉÒÔ´ú¿ª¸÷ÏîË°~~Ʊ
ÁªÏµµç»°£»13713763916
ÁªÏµÈË £» ÕÅ ÏÈ Éú
2011/11/18 Richard Guenther :
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Yuehai Du wrote:
>> 2011/11/17 Richard Guenther :
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Eric Botcazou
>>> wrote:
> Huh, IVOPTs should never cause a different size memory read. I wonder
> if the original issue would still r
On 11/17/2011 02:34 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 11/17/2011 12:37 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
>>> - oldval = convert_modes (SImode, mode, oldval, 1);
>>> + oldval = gen_reg_rtx (SImode);
>>> + convert_move (oldval, orig, 1);
>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 12:37 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> - oldval = convert_modes (SImode, mode, oldval, 1);
>> + oldval = gen_reg_rtx (SImode);
>> + convert_move (oldval, orig, 1);
>> oldval = expand_simple_binop (SImode, ASHIF
Snapshot gcc-4.5-2017 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-2017/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 11/17/2011 12:37 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> - oldval = convert_modes (SImode, mode, oldval, 1);
> + oldval = gen_reg_rtx (SImode);
> + convert_move (oldval, orig, 1);
>oldval = expand_simple_binop (SImode, ASHIFT, oldval, shift,
> oldval, 1,
Hi Diego,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Gerald, I've been searching for the release criteria pages for various
> releases. I haven't found anything. I was expecting to find them as
> top-level links on the home page.
the release criteria are there, cf.
> ls ~/wwwdocs/htdocs/*/
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>
>> Gerald, I've been searching for the release criteria pages for various
>> releases. I haven't found anything. I was expecting to find them as
>> top-level links on the home pag
On 11-11-17 11:19 , Richard Guenther wrote:
They are release specific - in gcc-MAJOR.MINOR/criteria.html. Especially
the list of primary and secondary targets may vary. It would be
certainly useful
to have a "next upcoming release" link on the main page, pointing to
gcc-4.7/index.html. But we
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> Gerald, I've been searching for the release criteria pages for various
> releases. I haven't found anything. I was expecting to find them as
> top-level links on the home page.
>
> Should I prepare a patch? Or should I have looked in a d
Gerald, I've been searching for the release criteria pages for various
releases. I haven't found anything. I was expecting to find them as
top-level links on the home page.
Should I prepare a patch? Or should I have looked in a different place?
Thanks. Diego.
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 17:22 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:14:57PM +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > We are aware that the TM language constructs should be documented in
> > extend.texi. However, the most recent public version of the C++ TM
> > specification document is outda
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:14:57PM +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> We are aware that the TM language constructs should be documented in
> extend.texi. However, the most recent public version of the C++ TM
> specification document is outdated, and a new version is supposed to be
> released in a few
We are aware that the TM language constructs should be documented in
extend.texi. However, the most recent public version of the C++ TM
specification document is outdated, and a new version is supposed to be
released in a few weeks.
Therefore, we'd like to wait until the release of the new specif
I'm seeing a lot of testsuite failures on powerpc-linux, some of
which are locking related. For example:
WARNING: Program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c/atomic-10.c execution test
This one fails in f3() here:
#pragma omp atomic
z4 *= 3;
z4 is an unsigned char, so we hit the QImode case in
rs60
15 matches
Mail list logo
