Hello All,
I need some help with setting the pipeline hazard recognizer (I am
working with gcc v4.5.1 for a private target).
A brief pipeline description of my target:
We have 2 functional units
1) For multiplication.
2) For All other instructions.
a) Multiply instructions are not
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:32:25 +0200, "Mikael Morin" wrote:
> I personally see no problem gfortran being reused in pathscale's compiler as
> long as pathscale's contribution is libre (free). It can even improve code
> quality to make gfortran backend independant (probably not much as the IR
> generat
Dear RMs,
I'd like to have permission to backport the new -mflat support for SPARC from
the mainline to the 4.6 branch. I received the first requests to reinstate
the option last year, when Laurent (and some others) started to work on it,
but the initial patch was submitted too late in the 4.6
"C. Bergström" writes:
> 1) What's wrong with commercial software?
I don't want to get into licensing fight, and I don't know anything
about the history of the Fortran frontend, but I do want to suggest a
correction to your wording. I'm not aware of any GCC contributor who
thinks there is anyth
On 06/19/2011 04:26 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jack Howarth writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>> For PCH what matters is not whether gcc defaults to generating PIE, but
>>> whether gcc itself is compiled as a PIE. In general I believe that a
>
Hi GCC steering committee,
Apparently, there is no GCC maintainer for Linux/x86 platform. I have
been working on GCC, as well as binutils and C libraries, for Linux/x86
over 20 years. I ported GCC, binutils and the C library to Linux/x86. I
like to be appointed as maintainer for Linux/x86 platfo
Jack Howarth writes:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> For PCH what matters is not whether gcc defaults to generating PIE, but
>> whether gcc itself is compiled as a PIE. In general I believe that a
>> PIE gcc will not support PCH--it will work most of th
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20110619 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20110619/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Sunday 19 June 2011 20:30:17 Christopher Bergström wrote:
> Nothing cloudy
>
> 1) Vet the codebase (stated this clearly)
> 2) Listen to what people say - (What needs to be worked on, are people
> open to things like dual licensing, what's the future of Fortran,
> etc..)
>
> For whatever reason
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jack Howarth writes:
>
> > What is the current state of supporting hardened operating systems
> > that default to -fpie/-fPIE/-pie in gcc trunk? Do those releases still use
> > their own patches for gcc or has all of those ch
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Janus Weil wrote:
> 2011/6/19 "C. Bergström" :
>> In this case I serve the end user/community and not directly open source.
>> Why? Would it be good for Fortran if a F2K3 front-end was freely available
>> under a commercially friendly license? (This is a deeper
Hi all,
I'm sorry if I made this turn into a discussion of the benefits of Free
Software, just two short points ...
On 2011-06-19 18:58, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:04:09PM +0700, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote:
Andy started the project and at the time of the fork still was the
majo
2011/6/19 "C. Bergström" :
> In this case I serve the end user/community and not directly open source.
> Why? Would it be good for Fortran if a F2K3 front-end was freely available
> under a commercially friendly license? (This is a deeper question I'd love
> feedback on)
From my point of view a
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:04:09PM +0700, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote:
>
>
> I can't say I really care about Andy's alleged copyright infringement.
> (My general point on matters like this is litigate or shut up. We're
> all here to get work done and licensing (licensing trolls and I don't
> mean y
On 06/19/11 10:03 PM, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
Hi Christopher,
On 2011-06-18 14:39, "C. Bergström" wrote:
On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contribut
Hi Christopher,
On 2011-06-18 14:39, "C. Bergström" wrote:
On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when
* Sarah Lynch:
> LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH& Co. KG
>
> Dudweiler Landstraße 99,
> 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
This company appears to be affiliated with "VDM Publishing", a company
which became notorious as a republisher of Wikipedia articles.
17 matches
Mail list logo
