Hello
With the autogen (GNU AutoGen) 5.11.9 on my Linux/Debian/Sid (or
perhaps /Experimental) the genfixes script fail, because of the version
test.
The following patch corrects that.
Index: fixincludes/genfixes
===
--- fixincludes
"Iyer, Balaji V" writes:
> I am trying to mark all for loop *top* labels with a integer value.
> This integer value is an index to another data structure that I'm trying to
> maintain.
>
>I just added the index value (as unsigned int) into the following data
> structure (in tree.h):
Hello Ian and Everyone,
Here is my problem specifically. I apologize in advance if this email is
long.
I am trying to mark all for loop *top* labels with a integer value.
This integer value is an index to another data structure that I'm trying to
maintain.
I just added the ind
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20110607 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20110607/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
This brings google/gcc-4_6 up to rev 174748.
Validated on x86_64.
Diego.
On 7 June 2011 15:39, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 7 June 2011 15:20, Richard Guenther wrote:
However, for my construct, which appears to be completely legal, I get a
warning, which I'd like to disable. How can I do that?
Ketaki, Sandeep,
My last merge from trunk into gimple-front-end was incomplete. I just
realized that I had failed to commit several directories. I just
committed a fix, so please make sure that your local checkout is at
rev 174754.
Diego.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Liu writes:
>
>> Yes, I am working on a new gcc target, it almost finished but PIC and
>> dynamic linking.
>> They want me make the toolchain support PIC and dynamic linking. I'm
>> not sure what should I do, will you show me a path?
>
>
Liu writes:
> Yes, I am working on a new gcc target, it almost finished but PIC and
> dynamic linking.
> They want me make the toolchain support PIC and dynamic linking. I'm
> not sure what should I do, will you show me a path?
[ Sorry for my earlier reply, I see now that you did also reply to t
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 7 June 2011 15:20, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>
>>> However, for my construct, which appears to be completely legal, I get a
>>> warning, which I'd like to disable. How can I do that? Currently I'm using
>>> -Wno-strict-aliasing, but I'd
On 7 June 2011 15:20, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> However, for my construct, which appears to be completely legal, I get a
>> warning, which I'd like to disable. How can I do that? Currently I'm using
>> -Wno-strict-aliasing, but I'd like to have a better solution. I tried to
>> cast (void*) b
This merge brings google/gcc-4_6 up to rev 174706.
Validated on x86_64.
Diego.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Herman, Geza wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 03:02 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Herman, Geza wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2011 12:27 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Herman, Geza wrote:
>
> Hi,
On 7 June 2011 15:05, Herman, Geza wrote:
>
> However, for my construct, which appears to be completely legal, I get a
> warning, which I'd like to disable. How can I do that? Currently I'm using
> -Wno-strict-aliasing, but I'd like to have a better solution. I tried to
> cast (void*) before the
On 06/07/2011 03:02 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Herman, Geza wrote:
On 06/07/2011 12:27 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Herman, Gezawrote:
Hi,
Sorry, if it has been discussed before, I found a lot of information on
strict alia
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Liu writes:
>
>> If I want make a GNU Toolchain support PIC code and Dynamic link,
>> do I need do some work on gcc?
>> If I do need. What should I do?
>
> The GNU toolchain supports PIC and dynamic linking by default. Are you
> talking a
Liu writes:
> If I want make a GNU Toolchain support PIC code and Dynamic link,
> do I need do some work on gcc?
> If I do need. What should I do?
The GNU toolchain supports PIC and dynamic linking by default. Are you
talking about some new gcc target? If so, you need to give us more
details.
Erik Olofsson writes:
> I have come to rely on C++0x support in GCC 4.6 and later. Until clang has
> feature parity with GCC 4.6, GCC seems to be my only choice for a darwin
> compiler.
>
> As I need to support iPhone it would seem arm-apple-darwin would be the
> correct target.
>
> Would ther
On 06/07/2011 12:27 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Herman, Geza wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, if it has been discussed before, I found a lot of information on
strict aliasing in gcc, but nothing about this particular case. I'd like to
code a custom container class: it has a c
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Herman, Geza wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 12:27 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Herman, Geza wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry, if it has been discussed before, I found a lot of information on
>>> strict aliasing in gcc, but nothing about
Hi all,
If I want make a GNU Toolchain support PIC code and Dynamic link,
do I need do some work on gcc?
If I do need. What should I do?
Thanks
--Liu
Hello,
I have come to rely on C++0x support in GCC 4.6 and later. Until clang has
feature parity with GCC 4.6, GCC seems to be my only choice for a darwin
compiler.
As I need to support iPhone it would seem arm-apple-darwin would be the correct
target.
Would there be any interest in a patch p
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Herman, Geza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, if it has been discussed before, I found a lot of information on
> strict aliasing in gcc, but nothing about this particular case. I'd like to
> code a custom container class: it has a char[] (or dynamically allocated
> "char *"
Please send questions about using GCC to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org, this
mailing list is for discussing development of GCC, thanks.
On 7 June 2011 04:51, Herman, Geza wrote:
>
> Here, gcc warns on the reinterpret_cast line.
Which version?
24 matches
Mail list logo