On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> -NEW
> -A maintainer has verified that this is indeed a bug in GCC. Every
> -once in a while, old reports will need to be rechecked, to find out
> -whether the bug still exists.
I think this text is superior for GCC to that on the generic page and so
w
Hi,
I just tried compiling with LTO for the first time. I can't figure
out what to try based on the error message below. Is there a HTML page
I should be looking at?
It seems that this did not work:
g++-4.6 -isystem ../../../master/boost/include -ffast-math -DNDEBUG
-DNDEBUG_DP -funr
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20110409 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20110409/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> All the status have well-defined meanings:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html
>
> Unfortunately, there is some duplication:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=fields.html
Quite some duplication, in fact. By virtue of the patch
Hello Ludovic,
ludovic.cour...@inria.fr (Ludovic Courtès) a écrit:
> The attached plug-in builds a function like this:
>
> my_function (void * parm.0)
> {
> __builtin_puts (parm.0);
> }
>
> However, the generated assembly clears the first-argument register
> (%edi) before calling ‘puts’
Hello,
* Jorge D'ELIA wrote on Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:24:58AM CEST:
> Here there are few comments from my college Lisandro Dalcin,
> an external developer of PETSc, e.g. see
> - Mensaje original -
> > The current scheme is that the user somehow compiles
> > the communication library (li
