On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Benjamin Redelings
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a C++ numerical code which runs about 40% slower which compiled
> with 4.6 than with 4.5. I plan to submit a bug report later -- reducing the
> bug to a test case will take a while and I can't start yet.
>
> Can anyo
Hi,
I have a C++ numerical code which runs about 40% slower which
compiled with 4.6 than with 4.5. I plan to submit a bug report later --
reducing the bug to a test case will take a while and I can't start yet.
Can anyone tell me if the 4.6 svn manpage is currently up-to-date
in desc
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:53, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>
>> I think it's a bug.
>
> OK, thanks for confirming. I filed
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071. Would a fix for
> this be OK for 4.6?
Sure, it's a regression.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:53, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> I think it's a bug.
OK, thanks for confirming. I filed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071. Would a fix for
this be OK for 4.6?
Diego.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> After -Werror is triggered, we are now emitting an extra blank line
> that we were not emitting before. Was this change intentional? Does
> anyone recognize this?
>
> $ cat a.cc
> char c = 257;
> $ g++-4.4.3 -c -o /dev/null -Werror a.cc
> c
Some of Linux distributions use Redhat branches as base for their builds
of GCC.
It would be nice to have Redhat branches in git mirror. At least for gcc
4.3 - 4.6.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
