Re: how can I write a right V32QI Unpack Low Data insn pattern?

2011-03-01 Thread Liu
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Liu writes: > >> I write a v16hi mode Unpack Low Data insn pattern and it is OK. v8si >> and v4di modes are OK, too. >> But the v32qi mode Unpack Low Data insn pattern get error like: >> ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/config/mips/hr.md:509: error: ex

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Dave, * Dave Korn wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:28:15AM CET: > http://mad-scientist.net/make/autodep.html > > although note that where that recommends using "-include" (under > "Avoiding ``No rule to make target ...'' Errors") to ignore would-be > errors from trying to include non-e

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Dave Korn
On 02/03/2011 05:10, Jack Howarth wrote: >I tried again without --enable-build-with-cxx and it worked. I'll see if I > can > reproduce it again with --enable-build-with-cxx. Bizarre. Can't see how that would be related, but you never know what kind of odd knock-on effects a bug can have..

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:58:41AM +, Dave Korn wrote: > On 02/03/2011 03:23, Jack Howarth wrote: > >Is anyone else building java with lto-bootstrap? At r170606 I am seeing > > a bootstrap > > failure which appears as... > > > make[4]: *** No rule to make target `.deps/gij.Plo'. Stop. >

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Dave Korn
On 02/03/2011 03:23, Jack Howarth wrote: >Is anyone else building java with lto-bootstrap? At r170606 I am seeing a > bootstrap > failure which appears as... > make[4]: *** No rule to make target `.deps/gij.Plo'. Stop. > make[3]: *** [all-multi] Error 2 > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished

new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Jack Howarth
-darwin10.7.0/lib/ -isystem /sw/lib/gcc4.6/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/include -isystem /sw/lib/gcc4.6/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/sys-include-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gcc-4.6-20110301/libjava -I./include -I./gcj -I../../../gcc-4.6-20110301/libjava -Iinclude -I../../../gcc-4.6-20110301

Liqin Chen now maintainer of SCORE port

2011-03-01 Thread Mark Mitchell
Liqin -- The GCC SC has appointed you the maintainer of the SCORE back-end. Congratulations! As we've discussed previously, the mere fact that there is a maintainer for a port does not imply that the port will not be deprecated or removed. So, I hope that you will be able to actively maintain t

Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-03-01 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 13:45 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Steve Ellcey writes: > > > According to PR 20095 the reason for not implementing > > __gcc_personality_v0 is that the HP unwind library does not implement > > _UA_END_OF_STACK which is a GCC extension to the standard IA64 unwind > > ABI

gcc-4.4-20110301 is now available

2011-03-01 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20110301 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20110301/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-03-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Steve Ellcey writes: > According to PR 20095 the reason for not implementing > __gcc_personality_v0 is that the HP unwind library does not implement > _UA_END_OF_STACK which is a GCC extension to the standard IA64 unwind > ABI and the HP-UX system unwind does not support it so the only way > to i

[ARM] Cortex-M3 multiply costs

2011-03-01 Thread Alexandre Pereira Nunes
AFAIK, Cortex-M3 has single-cycle multiply, right? I'm seeing gcc 4.5.2 prefering to do a lot (up to 5) of adds w/ shifts in places where a single mult would suffice. If I'm interpreting it right, where are the costs computed? Thanks! Alexandre

Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-03-01 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 11:10 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > It comes from the fact that we delay choosing a personality function > for functions that are happy with any personality. There is > the function_needs_eh_personality () function that decides this. > If you force that to never return eh

Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?

2011-03-01 Thread Denis Chertykov
2011/2/28 Georg-Johann Lay : > Denis Chertykov schrieb: >> >> 2011/2/26 Georg-Johann Lay : >> >>> Ok, this is the patch I meant: >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=86842 >>> >>> it allows just Pmode in r29:r28 because of some spill failures in PR15417 >>> and PR12017. >> >> I

Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

2011-03-01 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 21/02/11 10:12, Guillem Jover wrote: This was already discussed in this list some time ago [0]. But it came up again when restarting the discussion for the proposed new armhf port for Debian. [0] My arguments for why a distinct triplet is n

Re: -flto / -flto-partition=none question on ia64-hp-hpux11.23

2011-03-01 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 23:56 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> The gcc_personality is provided by libgcc_s I think, it's what you >> get when compiling C code with -fexceptions and install >> cleanup handlers. >> >> It seems that LTO comes to