Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

2011-02-14 Thread Douglas B Rupp
Joseph S. Myers wrote: * Interix (i[34567]86-*-interix3*) (see PR 47096). I would appreciate it if you could leave Interix. I'll take the responsibility to get it working.

Re: Variant code generation

2011-02-14 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
sankar chebolu writes: > Does GCC has any command line switches which generate variant code? This question as stated is not appropriate for the mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org, which is for the development of gcc. It would be appropriate for gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org. Please take any followups to gcc-

Re: A problem of our Gcc mirror

2011-02-14 Thread Harry Wei
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 08:51:22AM +0800, Mingjie Xing wrote: > 2011/2/15 Harry Wei : > > Hi us, > >When i want to download the mirror of Gcc 4.3  from the URL > > of China it shows broken. The URL is: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html > >You can click China's for a t

Variant code generation

2011-02-14 Thread sankar chebolu
Hi all, Does GCC has any command line switches which generate variant code? Regards, Sankar Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolb

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread Matt Thomas
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:50 PM, David Daney wrote: > On 02/14/2011 06:33 PM, Matt Thomas wrote: >> >> On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Daney wrote: >> >>> On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote: I have to wonder if it's worth the effort. The primary problem I see is that this

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread David Daney
On 02/14/2011 06:33 PM, Matt Thomas wrote: On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Daney wrote: On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote: I have to wonder if it's worth the effort. The primary problem I see is that this new ABI requires a 64bit kernel since faults through the upper 2G will go t

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread David Daney
On 02/14/2011 06:34 PM, Matt Thomas wrote: On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:26 PM, David Daney wrote: On 02/14/2011 06:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote: It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB but less than 4 GB, and

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread Matt Thomas
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:26 PM, David Daney wrote: > On 02/14/2011 06:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote: >>> It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB >>> but less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread Matt Thomas
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Daney wrote: > On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote: >> >> I have to wonder if it's worth the effort. The primary problem I see >> is that this new ABI requires a 64bit kernel since faults through the >> upper 2G will go through the XTLB miss exception ve

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread David Daney
On 02/14/2011 06:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote: It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB but less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want 64 bit pointers. This seems like a microscopically small ma

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread David Daney
On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote: On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:29 PM, David Daney wrote: Background: Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is segmented. Only the range from 0..2^31-1 is avai

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread Paul Koning
On Feb 14, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote: >> It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB >> but less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want 64 bit pointers. >> >> This seems like a micros

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread Joe Buck
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote: > It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB > but less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want 64 bit pointers. > > This seems like a microscopically small market segment. I can't see any > s

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread Paul Koning
On Feb 14, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:29 PM, David Daney wrote: > >> Background: >> >> Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of >> user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is >> segmented. Only the ran

Re: A problem of our Gcc mirror

2011-02-14 Thread Mingjie Xing
2011/2/15 Harry Wei : > Hi us, >           When i want to download the mirror of Gcc 4.3  from the URL of > China it shows broken. The URL is: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html >           You can click China's for a try.  Could anyone do for it. Or i want > to take the mirror on my website server(

Re: RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread Matt Thomas
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:29 PM, David Daney wrote: > Background: > > Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of > user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is > segmented. Only the range from 0..2^31-1 is available. Pointer > values are always

RFC: A new MIPS64 ABI

2011-02-14 Thread David Daney
Background: Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is segmented. Only the range from 0..2^31-1 is available. Pointer values are always sign extended. Because there are not already enough MIPS ABIs

Re: GCC bootstrap mismatch on OS X 10.4

2011-02-14 Thread David Fang
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 05:27:37PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 13 February 2011 09:01, Csaba Raduly wrote: Any idea what could be the problem and how to fix it? Should I just run a simple "make"? Questions about using or building gcc should be sent to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org, not this lis

Re: plese help to install gcc 2.95.3 compiler

2011-02-14 Thread Andrew Haley
On 02/14/2011 05:50 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: nayanalekha sugandanee writes: I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3 for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3. This question is not appropriate for

A problem of our Gcc mirror

2011-02-14 Thread Harry Wei
Hi us, When i want to download the mirror of Gcc 4.3 from the URL of China it shows broken. The URL is: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html You can click China's for a try. Could anyone do for it. Or i want to take the mirror on my website server(www.harrywei.org). I don't kno

Re: plese help to install gcc 2.95.3 compiler

2011-02-14 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
nayanalekha sugandanee writes: > I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3 > for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I > remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3. This question is not appropriate for the mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org, which is for

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

2011-02-14 Thread Nathan Froyd
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 08:11:07AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joseph S. Myers > wrote: > > appear to involve a simultaneously maintained set of upstream components > > that are usable together in their current upstream forms; they got Linux > > kernel support u

Re: plese help to install gcc 2.95.3 compiler

2011-02-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 14 February 2011 16:08, Paolo Carlini wrote: > On 02/14/2011 05:06 PM, nayanalekha sugandanee wrote: >> I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3 >> for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I >> remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3. >> > I wou

Re: loop hoisting fails

2011-02-14 Thread Paulo J. Matos
On 11/02/11 19:41, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: My case was somewhat different. I think I just patched gcse_constant_p. Thanks!

Re: plese help to install gcc 2.95.3 compiler

2011-02-14 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 02/14/2011 05:06 PM, nayanalekha sugandanee wrote: > I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3 > for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I > remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3. > I would recommend asking the closest computer science muse

plese help to install gcc 2.95.3 compiler

2011-02-14 Thread nayanalekha sugandanee
I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3 for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3. Thanks!