Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET is the one that should be used. However, you're
> right that it doesn't appear to happen. This is a bug.
...
> I think you need to edit the file gcc/config/t-slibgcc-elf-ver.
Thanks--adding $(LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET) to SHLIB_LINK in that file seems
to wo
p...@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
>> make -j 8 profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3"
>>
>> I noticed the absence of these flags being utilized in libdecnumber,
>> libffi, libgcc, etc.
>
> On a related note, how can I pass *linker* flags for linking libgcc?
> I've passed
Jack Howarth wrote:
> make -j 8 profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3"
>
> I noticed the absence of these flags being utilized in libdecnumber,
> libffi, libgcc, etc.
On a related note, how can I pass *linker* flags for linking libgcc?
I've passed --with-stage1-ldflags and --with-boot-ldflags to
Andrew Pinski writes:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Jack Howarth
> wrote:
>> While doing bootstraps with...
>>
>> make -j 8 profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3"
>>
>> I noticed the absence of these flags being utilized in libdecnumber, libffi,
>> libgcc, etc.
>> This also appears to be
Hi,
I created a website for x32 project:
https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
I will create GCC and glibc branches soon to enable x32
support in GCC and glibc. I am looking for contributions
to GCC and glibc.
Thanks.
--
H.J.
This is the beta release of binutils 2.21.51.0.6 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2011 0118 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree.
You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> After some discussion on IRC, here is another approach to resolving the
> issue with static linking and LTO.
>
> In this approach, the linker keeps track of all archives found after the
> first file claimed by the plugin. If the plugin ad
On 19 January 2011 01:13, Carles Setó wrote:
> Dear GNU managers,
Please don't cross-post like this - your question is suitable to the
gcc-help mailing list, not the other addresses you used. Please keep
any follow up to the gcc-help list, thanks.
> I have installed gcc-4.5.0. on my PC and I w
Dear GNU managers,
I have installed gcc-4.5.0. on my PC and I want to compile to practise
Objective-C language. One of my purposes is training to become a Apple
developer.
What file I should download, (unzip), objc or objcp?, what's the difference
between these two ones?
Thank you very much,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> While doing bootstraps with...
>
> make -j 8 profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3"
>
> I noticed the absence of these flags being utilized in libdecnumber, libffi,
> libgcc, etc.
> This also appears to be limiting the coverage of the lto-bo
While doing bootstraps with...
make -j 8 profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O3"
I noticed the absence of these flags being utilized in libdecnumber, libffi,
libgcc, etc.
This also appears to be limiting the coverage of the lto-bootstrap as well. Are
there any
plans to address in the near term
After some discussion on IRC, here is another approach to resolving the
issue with static linking and LTO.
In this approach, the linker keeps track of all archives found after the
first file claimed by the plugin. If the plugin adds any object files,
and the object files refer to any symbols whic
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20110118 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20110118/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hi Walter,
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008, Walter Spector wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
> OTOH, the SGI freeware site is frozen, and nekochan is where much of
> the real freeware development for IRIX is.
if you check out the updated version of the page above, does this
look good to you
2011/1/14 Robert Millan :
> 2011/1/12 Robert Millan :
>>> * The headers config/kfreebsd-gnu.h etc. override
>>> GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER. But the 64-bit configurations
>>> x86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu and x86_64-*-knetbsd*-gnu do not appear to
>>> use any header that would override GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER32
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> At Google we have a number of features developed internally that, for
> various reasons, have not yet been ported upstream.
>
> We are currently looking for ways to (a) contribute these to mainline,
> and (b) avoid accumulating more local pat
At Google we have a number of features developed internally that, for
various reasons, have not yet been ported upstream.
We are currently looking for ways to (a) contribute these to mainline,
and (b) avoid accumulating more local patches by trying to stay closer
to upstream trunk for future contr
17 matches
Mail list logo
