On Sun, 2 May 2010, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The obvious thing to do is to add a note that it represents state as of
> 2002. Some bits are probably still relevant, but I don't know which.
That's a good idea. Implemented thusly (if late).
Gerald
Index: cpplib.html
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20110115 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20110115/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:46 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:50 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:42 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 12/30/2010 01:08 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I had thi
Achilleas Margaritis writes:
> So, if the compiler checks the code, and the documentation says
> whatever must be said about the program, headers are completely
> redundant.
I think this is often/usually not true in practice though.
It seems _far_ more common for there to be reasonable header fi
