On 12/21/2010 06:12 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 12:12 +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:
Hi,
While working on a bug, I found some code in ARM port that I don't
understand.
In ARM_LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS and arm_legitimize_address, we allow a
very small offset for DImode addressin
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20101221 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20101221/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Joel Sherrill wrote:
I was experimenting with adding microblaze-rtems*
and got this error:
>
checking for sqrtl in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not
allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libquadmath] Error 1
I am puzzled: While this issue existed, it shoul
On 21/12/2010 14:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> checking how to run the C preprocessor...
> /users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-microblaze/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-microblaze/./gcc/ -nostdinc
> -B/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-microblaze/microblaze-rtems4.11/newlib/
> -isystem
> /users/joel/tes
Liu writes:
> I changed FIXED_REGISTERS into 0, FIXED_REGISTERS into 1,
> CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS into 1.
>
> build and test it, but I still get the same error.
Have you updated HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK?
I encourage you to carefully read the gcc internals manual. It's pretty
good on this kind of
Hi,
I was experimenting with adding microblaze-rtems*
and got this error:
checking how to run the C preprocessor...
/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-microblaze/./gcc/xgcc
-B/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-microblaze/./gcc/ -nostdinc
-B/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-microblaze/microblaze-rtems4.11/newlib/
2010/12/21 Ian Lance Taylor :
> Liu writes:
>
>> I need add 256bits-register support for our MIPS-based
>> processor, so I add some codes.
>> When I build gcc and test it, get a error "unable to find a
>> register to spill in class 'XX_REGS'"
>> can you tell me how to add 256bits
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 12:12 +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on a bug, I found some code in ARM port that I don't
> understand.
>
> In ARM_LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS and arm_legitimize_address, we allow a
> very small offset for DImode addressing.
>
> In ARM_LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_AD