¹ó¹«Ë¾ ÄúºÃ :
±¾Ë¾ÊÇרҵ´ú¿ª¹«Ë¾
ÏÖÓÐ: ÆÕͨ `ÔËÊä ` ¹ã¸æ ` ÉÌÆ· `ÆÕͨÔöÖµ¡®
½¨Öþ°²×°. µÈ{¹ú/µØ¶}óàÑÓŻݴú¿ª.
ÁªÏµÈË: Áº Éú ÊÖ»ú: 139 2654 1830 QQ:1425253650
¿ÉÏÈÌṩ¶/ƱÓú󸶿
Hi Art,
> No luck with this mornings builds on both x86 and sparc.
>
> My last successful i386-pc-solaris2.10 build was several weeks ago; all
> the build attempts fail at this assertion in the function/file below:
>
> /home/ahaas/gnu/gcc.git/gcc/lto/lto-lang.c: In function 'lto_type_for_mode':
>
Peter Jensen writes:
> I am creating a plugin which parses the generic tree and inserts a function
> call in a if/else clause.
> The function writes which lineno gets executed to stdout.
> I wish to get the line number for the if statement and for the else
> statement. (and not the body. eg ELS
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> /usr/bin/ld: error: unsupported symbol binding
This is, as you know, a linker issue.
> This on Debian/Testing/AMD64 and ld is GOLD:
> % /usr/bin/ld --version
> GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Debian 2.20.1-system.20100303) 1.9
> Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation
Hi,
I've been reading as much as possible and trying to follow the source as
much as possible and have, I think, come across a bit of a stopper as it
may require a re-arrangement of GNAT sources, if I'm right, that is.
So an exception object is defined within a-exexpr-gcc.adb as:
type Unwind_
Hi.
No luck with this mornings builds on both x86 and sparc.
My last successful i386-pc-solaris2.10 build was several weeks ago; all
the build attempts fail at this assertion in the function/file below:
/home/ahaas/gnu/gcc.git/gcc/lto/lto-lang.c: In function 'lto_type_for_mode':
/home/ahaas/gnu/
Hi,
I am creating a plugin which parses the generic tree and inserts a function
call in a if/else clause.
The function writes which lineno gets executed to stdout.
I wish to get the line number for the if statement and for the else statement.
(and not the body. eg ELSE_CLAUSE).
My problem is tha
On 10/08/10 18:38:29, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> I am not an expert on these optimizations, but why would you want that?
> The optimizations involved are indeed expensive (otherwise it would be
> -O1 not -O2), but once you asked for them, why only get warnings
> without the code generation impr
Alan Modra wrote on 2010/10/11 14:58:45:
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:20:06AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Now I have had a closer look at this and it looks much like -fpic
> > on ppc32, you still use the GOT/TOC to load the address where the data is.
>
> No, with ppc64 -mcmodel=medium you
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:20:06AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Now I have had a closer look at this and it looks much like -fpic
> on ppc32, you still use the GOT/TOC to load the address where the data is.
No, with ppc64 -mcmodel=medium you use the GOT/TOC pointer plus an
offset to address lo
Hello,
When building trunk rev 165282 configured with
'/usr/src/Lang/gcc-trunk-bstarynk/configure' '--enable-plugins'
'--program-suffix=-plaintrunk' '--enable-maintainer-mode'
'--enable-checks=tree,gc' '--disable-bootstrap' '--disable-multilib'
'--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs' 'CF
11 matches
Mail list logo