MIPS64 GCC not building at r165246

2010-10-09 Thread David Daney
Hi Richard, I was just trying to build the trunk GCC at r165246 Configured thusly: $ ../trunk/configure --target=mips64-linux --with-sysroot=/home/daney/mips64-linux --prefix=/home/daney/mips64-linux --with-arch=mips64r2 --enable-languages=c --disable-libmudflap Back on: r162086 | rsandif

gcc-4.6-20101009 is now available

2010-10-09 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20101009 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20101009/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?

2010-10-09 Thread Florian Weimer
* Geert Bosch: > The Ada front end has very extensive warnings. I don't think > they really contribute measurably to performance. > We don't try to construct call graphs to determine > wether the array reference will be executed or not. > If the line appears in your program, it will cause an > err

Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?

2010-10-09 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 9 October 2010 21:34, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 09:22:42PM +0200, Manuel L?pez-Ib??ez wrote: >> My intention by answering Gary is to point out that if he is thinking >> about working on this problem, he should consider building a cheap >> FE-specific CFG, rather than try to

Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?

2010-10-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 09:22:42PM +0200, Manuel L?pez-Ib??ez wrote: > My intention by answering Gary is to point out that if he is thinking > about working on this problem, he should consider building a cheap > FE-specific CFG, rather than try to share the current infrastructure > between FE and m

Re: GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?

2010-10-09 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 9 October 2010 05:22, Geert Bosch wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2010, at 18:18, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > >> It is possible to do it quite fast. Clang implements all warnings, >> including Wuninitialized, in the FE using fast analysis and they claim >> very low false positives. >> However, there are

Re: %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data

2010-10-09 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Michael Meissner wrote on 2010/10/07 20:21:38: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 04:50:50PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Why not offer some of this on PowerPC32? mcmodel=small would probably be > > enough. > > Well as they say, contributions are welcome. Note, 32-bit mode doesn't need A first c