gcc-4.5-20100923 is now available

2010-09-23 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20100923 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20100923/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Interprocedural points-to analysis

2010-09-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Hongtao wrote: >  Hi All, > > Has the interprocedural points-to analysis(pass-ipa-pta) been put into > practice, i.e. using the ipa points-to set to aid optimizations? Yes, it improves alias-analysis. The interface to optimizers is the same as local points-to an

Interprocedural points-to analysis

2010-09-23 Thread Hongtao
Hi All, Has the interprocedural points-to analysis(pass-ipa-pta) been put into practice, i.e. using the ipa points-to set to aid optimizations? Thanks, Hongtao

Re: Calculation of RTX Costs

2010-09-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
pocma...@gmail.com (Paulo J. Matos) writes: > So, from what I understand, it seems that if there is machine > independent code using COSTS_N_INSNS, I should be using it otherwise > relative comparisons just don't make sense. > > However, from what I can see we have cost hooks for: > - register mov

Re: gengtype indentation issues

2010-09-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Diego Novillo writes: > I'd suggest sending one initial patch fixing indentation issues and > then sending your functional changes on top of the first patch. Yes. Basile, I'm sorry you have to struggle with some poor existing indentation in gengtype.c, but the GNU style indentation is not all t

Re: Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches

2010-09-23 Thread Nicola Pero
>> For example, if I post a patch that changes a piece of code in >> gcc/c-parser.c which is only ever used if (c_dialect_objc ()), then I >> assume that it is part of the Objective-C front-end, and the >> Objective-C/Objective-C++ maintainers are in charge of approving it. >> Once they appro

Re: Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello t7, * t66...@gmail.com wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:01:31AM CEST: > I don't know if my problem suites this description. No, it doesn't. > Currently installed libtool on this system is, > ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 2.2.6b > > I recently tested the LTO feature of GCC (targeting windows

plugin headers no longer installed?

2010-09-23 Thread Jack Howarth
Is the following issue appearing on any other targets? On x86_64-apple-darwin10, sometime after r164502 but by r164564, the installation of plugin headers was lost. At r164502, we still had the previous behavior on darwin where plugin headers were installed in... /sw/lib/gcc4.6/lib/gcc/x86_6

Re: Where are the new GCC releases?

2010-09-23 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Sure. Thanks, done after bootstrap/regtesting on x86_64-suse-linux. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches

2010-09-23 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Nicola Pero wrote: > For example, if I post a patch that changes a piece of code in > gcc/c-parser.c which is only ever used if (c_dialect_objc ()), then I > assume that it is part of the Objective-C front-end, and the > Objective-C/Objective-C++ maintainers are in charge o

Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10

2010-09-23 Thread Art Haas
local/bin/as --with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/export/home/arth/local/bin/ld --enable-libstdcxx-pch=no --with-cpu=ultrasparc3 --with-tune=ultrasparc3 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20100923 (experimental) (GCC) $ Thanks. Art Haas

Re: gengtype indentation issues

2010-09-23 Thread Diego Novillo
I'd suggest sending one initial patch fixing indentation issues and then sending your functional changes on top of the first patch. Diego.

Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010

2010-09-23 Thread NightStrike
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 21/09/2010 02:51, NightStrike wrote: > >> The toolchain is broken once again here: >> >> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. >> -I../../../build/mingw/mingw-w64-crt >>  -m32 -I../../../build/mingw/mingw-w64-crt/include -D_CRTBLD >> -I

gengtype indentation issues

2010-09-23 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello All, References http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01739.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01740.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01742.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01743.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/

Clarification on who can approve Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser patches

2010-09-23 Thread Nicola Pero
Most of the Objective-C/Objective-C++ parser code is in files shared with the C/C++ frontend, hence I'm confused about who approves what. For example, if I post a patch that changes a piece of code in gcc/c-parser.c which is only ever used if (c_dialect_objc ()), then I assume that it is part of

Re: Calculation of RTX Costs

2010-09-23 Thread Paulo J. Matos
Ian Lance Taylor writes: > pocma...@gmail.com (Paulo J. Matos) writes: > >> Moreover, is there a reason for the existence of COST_N_INSNS(x) and why >> this multiplies x by 4? Is 4 just a special number? Any reason on why I >> should be using COST_N_INSNS instead of just assigning *total (of >> t