We would like x86_64-w64-mingw32 to become a secondary target for 4.6.
What has to be checked off for that to happen? I have an
auto-testsuite-thinger running constantly now and posting results to
the ML (it takes several days to do a full dl/build/test, so it's not
daily, but it's continuous).
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20100904 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20100904/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 08:22:24AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Paolo,
> > Could you please look over PR45524 and then revert the offending
> > r163815/r163816 that has broken decimal float support for all non-linux
> > targets. That patch is wr
Hi,
> Greetings,
>
> I was wondering if any one was working on the C++-0x range for loop.
Didn't you notice the recent patch on the gcc-patches mailing list? As far as I
know the last iteration supports also uses in templates and the author is
finishing the Copyright Assignment paperwork.
Pao
Greetings,
I was wondering if any one was working on the C++-0x range for loop.
I found an implementation in ConceptGCC that looks like it could be
modified.
The basic strategy was to parse the loop and essentially rewrite it as
an old fashioned loop.
Of course concepts were used to come up
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/install/ (Empty directory)
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/install/specific.html
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/install/test.html
> Thanks for the report, Gareth. I'll have a look how we can address
> t
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Paolo,
> Could you please look over PR45524 and then revert the offending
> r163815/r163816 that has broken decimal float support for all non-linux
> targets. That patch is wrong in so many ways, it is hard to know where
> to start...
>
> 1)
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 05:53, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Paolo,
> Could you please look over PR45524 and then revert the offending
> r163815/r163816 that has broken decimal float support for all non-linux
> targets. That patch is wrong in so many ways, it is hard to know where
> to start...
>
> 1) Mo
