warnings as errors in gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c

2010-07-09 Thread Jack Howarth
Is anyone seeing this issue on other targets? On x86_64-apple-darwin10, with the patch... Index: Makefile.in === --- Makefile.in (revision 162030) +++ Makefile.in (working copy) @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ POSTSTAGE1_CXX_EXPORT = \

Re: Two debug entries for one local variables, is it a bug in GCC or GDB

2010-07-09 Thread Daniel Berlin
Your bug was not a real bug, AFAICT. At least the debug info you have shown in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-01/msg00054.html is not wrong. Certainly, two DIES were unnecessary, but the way it did it was not broken. Note that one of them is marked as DW_AT_declaration, specifying that is where the

Re: Problem configuring uclinux toolchain

2010-07-09 Thread Anthony Green
On 7/9/2010 4:44 PM, Anthony Green wrote: Building and testing the moxie-uclinux toolchain with the HEAD of GCC is very simple: $ git clone git://github.com/atgreen/moxiedev $ cd moxiedev/gcc $ ../scripts/fix-svn.sh $ ./contrib/gcc_update $ cd .. $ PATH=`pwd`/root/usr/bin:$PATH $ ant build Of

Re: Problem configuring uclinux toolchain

2010-07-09 Thread Anthony Green
On 7/9/2010 11:59 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: On 7/9/10 3:22 PM, Anthony Green wrote: Hi Maxim, Recent changes to config.gcc are preventing me from building a moxie-uclinux toolchain. Anthony, What is the error the build process is failing on? Here are the details: Without OPTION_ANDROID=0:

The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.10 is released

2010-07-09 Thread H.J. Lu
This is the beta release of binutils 2.20.51.0.10 for Linux, which is based on binutils 2010 0707 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various changes. It is purely for Linux. All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree. You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been

Re: How to pass a pathlist in RUNTESTFLAGS?

2010-07-09 Thread IainS
On 9 Jul 2010, at 17:28, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: On 9 July 2010 16:55, Doug Semler wrote: On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, IainS > wrote: Hi, I want to do this: RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-foo/-bar/--sysroot=/path/to/ somewhere " I've tried escaping the path with \ ' inverting

Re: How to pass a pathlist in RUNTESTFLAGS?

2010-07-09 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 9 July 2010 16:55, Doug Semler wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, IainS > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to do this: >> >>  RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-foo/-bar/--sysroot=/path/to/somewhere " >> >> I've tried escaping the path with \ ' inverting the " and ' ..  all to no >> avail ..

Re: Problem configuring uclinux toolchain

2010-07-09 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
On 7/9/10 3:22 PM, Anthony Green wrote: Hi Maxim, Recent changes to config.gcc are preventing me from building a moxie-uclinux toolchain. Anthony, What is the error the build process is failing on? Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov CodeSourcery ma...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x724

Re: How to pass a pathlist in RUNTESTFLAGS?

2010-07-09 Thread Doug Semler
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, IainS wrote: > Hi, > > I want to do this: > >  RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-foo/-bar/--sysroot=/path/to/somewhere " > > I've tried escaping the path with \ ' inverting the " and ' ..  all to no > avail .. > >  what gets passed is -foo -bar --sysroot= -mpath -m

How to pass a pathlist in RUNTESTFLAGS?

2010-07-09 Thread IainS
Hi, I want to do this: RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-foo/-bar/--sysroot=/path/to/ somewhere " I've tried escaping the path with \ ' inverting the " and ' .. all to no avail .. what gets passed is -foo -bar --sysroot= -mpath -mto -msomewhere .. google hasn't helped.. anyone know w

(define_mode_const), a proposal

2010-07-09 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! During the macroization of x86 RTX patterns, it became clear that certain patterns can't be macroized due to mode-dependant (const_int N) RTXes, where the value of X depends on current mode. As an example, here are two insn patterns from i386/i386.md: (define_insn "x86_64_shld" [(set (ma

Problem configuring uclinux toolchain

2010-07-09 Thread Anthony Green
Hi Maxim, Recent changes to config.gcc are preventing me from building a moxie-uclinux toolchain. They look related to your 2010-05-27 change for adding support for the Bionic C library. Your patches says that you updated the moxie-*-uclinux* config, but were you able to test this? I had t

Re: a few beginner questiosn

2010-07-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 9 July 2010 06:41, BLUE 3TOO wrote: > > Hi, > >    I have following questions and would appreciate any comment. Thanks you > very much. > >    1. How to build a debugable version of GCC? I tried to set CFLGAS & > CXXFLAGS to "-O0 -g -fno-inline" in my configure command line, but it seems > it

Re: where is INTEGER_CST defined?

2010-07-09 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:20 AM, BLUE 3TOO wrote: Hi, I cannot find the declaration of INTEGER_CST. Seems it is generated during the build process? Is there a way to let the building process to generate all the source files that are needed for a smooth source browsing? Thanks It is d

where is INTEGER_CST defined?

2010-07-09 Thread BLUE 3TOO
Hi, I cannot find the declaration of INTEGER_CST. Seems it is generated during the build process? Is there a way to let the building process to generate all the source files that are needed for a smooth source browsing? Thanks _