Your FAQ at the below URLS conflicts as to which autoconf should be used. one
says 2.13 th other says 2.64. 2.65 is currently available.
http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#generated_files
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20100513 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20100513/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 5/4/10 15:11 , Wolfgang kaifler wrote:
> (gdb) p browse_tree (current_function_decl)
> No symbol "browse_tree" in current context.
> (gdb)
>
> What i'm doing wrong? Any ideas?
The tree browser code has bitrotted to the point that I think it should
be removed, unfortunately. It's a great cand
On 5/6/10 10:24 , Richard Guenther wrote:
> Any comments or objections?
I agree. It sounds useful. It's a bit confusing in that I don't know
whether it means 'compile very fast' or 'make my code run very fast'.
I've seen it mean the latter in most places, so I guess that's fine.
Allowing backe
On 5/10/10 10:31 , Kevin Williams wrote:
> 1. What is the correct behaviour for a FE in terms of setting the
> global variables cfun and current_function_declaration?
They should be set to the current function being parsed. These will be
set to NULL when the compiler is working in IPA mode.
> 2
"Amker.Cheng" writes:
> Hi:
> as to page http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-05/msg00091.html,
> If the fpu register can not copied to/from memory directly, I have
> to use intermediate GPR registers.
>
> In fact, I return GP_REGS if copying x to a register in class FP_REGS
> in any mode(including CC
DJ Delorie wrote:
> I discovered that if you build a plain arm-elf toolchain, the default
> float-abis for gcc and gas don't match. I added this patch locally to
> make it "just work" but it seems to me it would be better to have the
> defaults match, although I'm not sure how to enforce that. C
Andrew Pinski schrieb:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Eggenmüller Bernd wrote:
Is there any implementation with less registers like this.
libgcc2 is written in C; so if it fails to compile you need to fix up
your backend. There might need some middle-end fixes too with this
small n
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Eggenmüller Bernd wrote:
> Is there any implementation with less registers like this.
libgcc2 is written in C; so if it fails to compile you need to fix up
your backend. There might need some middle-end fixes too with this
small number of registers used. You mig
Ian Lance Taylor schrieb:
Eggenmüller Bernd writes:
Ian Lance Taylor schrieb:
Eggenmüller Bernd writes:
is it possible to translate the libgcc2 when i only have 4 registers
which are 32 bits long.
One of the four Registers is defined as Basepointer and another as
Stackpoi
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Rathish C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to add the soft-fp support to a new target. I have
> checked the implementation done in rs6000 port, and done the
> similar modifications to our port. I have made the following
> changes.
>
> (1) Added the following files
>
Hari,
Here are some patterns similar to yours.
(define_insn "putbx"
[(set (reg:BXBC R_BX) (unspec:BXBC [(match_operand:QI 0 "firepath_register"
"vr")] UNSPEC_BXM))
(unspec:BXBC [(reg:BXBC R_BX)] UNSPEC_BX)] <--- Important to avoid some
wrong optimization (Maybe DCE, I couldn't remembe
Hi,
I am trying to add the soft-fp support to a new target. I have
checked the implementation done in rs6000 port, and done the
similar modifications to our port. I have made the following
changes.
(1) Added the following files
t-fprules-softfp
sfp-machine.h
(2) Modified th
The patterns for PUT/GET were
; Scalar Put instruction.
(define_insn "commsPut"
[(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:HI 0 "const_int_operand" "")
(match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")]
UNSPEC_PUT)]
""
"PUT %R1,%0\t// PORT(%0) := %R1"
[(set_attr "type"
14 matches
Mail list logo
