Re: The scope of a for statement

2010-03-13 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 15:07 -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:40:44PM -0800, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:06:01PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:38:23AM -0800, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > I tried to do

Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout

2010-03-13 Thread Jon
Hello Ian Ian Lance Taylor wrote, On 22/02/10 03:26: Jon writes: Good point. Updated patch attached for review. I suppose this counts as a functionality change, and as such should not be committed until after the release branch is made. This is OK when we are back in stage 1, with a Change

status of GCC 4.5 w.r.t. plugins?

2010-03-13 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello All I am not sure to understand what exactly is the current status http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-02/msg00270.html of GCC 4.5 with respect to plugins. I believe I understand much more its current status w.r.t. to other GCC roles (in particular, the major role of generating object code f