Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler?

2010-03-11 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Laurynas Biveinis wrote: 1. (in ordinary non plugin mode, within a plugin-enabled GCC) gengtype not only generates all the necessary gt*.h files, but also generate an easy-to-parse textual representation (perhaps in JSON or XML or Lispy syntax) of all the data it has processed (that is of all the

Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler?

2010-03-11 Thread Laurynas Biveinis
> 1. (in ordinary non plugin mode, within a plugin-enabled GCC) gengtype > not only generates all the necessary gt*.h files, but also generate an > easy-to-parse textual representation (perhaps in JSON or XML or Lispy > syntax) of all the data it has processed (that is of all the GTY-ed > data desc

gcc-4.5-20100311 is now available

2010-03-11 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20100311 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20100311/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler?

2010-03-11 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello all, On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:12:51AM +0100, Laurynas Biveinis wrote, citing me Basile: > > MELT only need gengtype to generate its gt-melt-runtime.h but I have no idea > > if that file depends upon the configuration (and notably the target for > > which GCC is built). The GTY-ed data of

Re: [lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13?

2010-03-11 Thread Paweł Sikora
Dnia 11-03-2010 o 14:51:39 H.J. Lu napisał(a): checking for libelf/gelf.h... no checking for the correct version of libelf... yes I am using elfutils-libelf 0.145. ahh, right. i've accidentally used an older version 0.142 which libelf.h contains only: extern int elf_getshstrndx (Elf *__elf,

Re: [lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13?

2010-03-11 Thread H.J. Lu
2010/3/11 Paweł Sikora : > hi, > > i would like to ask why the LTO forces libelf-0.8.x in configure.ac? > linux/unix distros have well tested elfutils-libelf subpackage, > so what is the point in forcing new library? > > i've just built (with little hack) gcc/trunk with elfutils-libelf > and lto wo

[lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13?

2010-03-11 Thread Paweł Sikora
hi, i would like to ask why the LTO forces libelf-0.8.x in configure.ac? linux/unix distros have well tested elfutils-libelf subpackage, so what is the point in forcing new library? i've just built (with little hack) gcc/trunk with elfutils-libelf and lto works fine. BR, Pawel.

Re: Use the wctype builtins functions

2010-03-11 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 03/05/2010 05:03 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: I don't know if there's an existing free software implementation of UAX#14 (Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm) suitable for use in GCC; that would be the very heavyweight approach. Yes. You can get it from gnulib like gdb does, or you can link libu

Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler?

2010-03-11 Thread Laurynas Biveinis
> MELT only need gengtype to generate its gt-melt-runtime.h but I have no idea > if that file depends upon the configuration (and notably the target for > which GCC is built). The GTY-ed data of MELT does not depend (IMHO) upon the > configuration directly (in the sense that there is no #ifdef arou