Hi,
Giuseppe Scrivano writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>>> The GUPC project is described here: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gupc.html.
>>
>> This URL is 404.
>
> Hey Ludovic, it works well here.
Works for me now, don’t know what happened.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 00:33 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> > $ ../trunk/configure --prefix=/n/100/guerby/install-trunk
> > --enable-languages=c --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls
> > --enable-threads=posix --with-mpfr=/opt/cfarm/mpfr-2.4.2-32
> > --w
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 16:34 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to build a fully 32 bits GCC on a x86_64-linux 64 bits debian
> > system which has all the 32 bits libraries installed (this is for the
> > GCC compile farm testers)
On 03/03/2010 10:53 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> On 03/03/2010 04:52 AM, b95705...@ntu.edu.tw wrote:
>>
>>> I am highly interestd in implementing C compiler for EFI Byte Code in
>>> gcc and participate in Google Summer Code.
>>>
>>> EFI is a
On Mar 3, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 03/03/2010 04:52 AM, b95705...@ntu.edu.tw wrote:
>
>> I am highly interestd in implementing C compiler for EFI Byte Code in
>> gcc and participate in Google Summer Code.
>>
>> EFI is a much larger, more complex,OS-like replacement for the ol
On 03/03/2010 04:52 AM, b95705...@ntu.edu.tw wrote:
> I am highly interestd in implementing C compiler for EFI Byte Code in
> gcc and participate in Google Summer Code.
>
> EFI is a much larger, more complex,OS-like replacement for the older BIOS
> firmware interface present in all IBM PC-compati
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> The GUPC project is described here: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gupc.html.
>
> This URL is 404.
Hey Ludovic, it works well here. Can the trailing dot be the problem?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When handling builtin functions there's the fold_builtin and the
> expand_builtin that can be defined. They seem to do their work at
> different times but I am not exactly sure if they are alternatives or
> complementary.
>
> Can'
Hello Gary,
Gary Funck writes:
> A GCC front-end (and runtime) for UPC (Unified Parallel C) is available
> via the following GCC branch: svn://svn/gcc/branches/gupc.
Good to hear! ;-)
> The GUPC project is described here: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gupc.html.
This URL is 404.
Thanks,
Ludo’
Hello,
When handling builtin functions there's the fold_builtin and the
expand_builtin that can be defined. They seem to do their work at
different times but I am not exactly sure if they are alternatives or
complementary.
Can't find anywhere explaining their use besides what's found in the
inter
10 matches
Mail list logo