Quoting Andrew Pinski :
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 27, 2010, at 10:17 AM, "Daniel R. Grayson" wrote:
I wonder whether there is a plan to optimize code such as this:
extern int (const int x);
void () {
(444);
(444);
}
by not pushing the constant argument twice. I
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 27, 2010, at 10:17 AM, "Daniel R. Grayson"
wrote:
I wonder whether there is a plan to optimize code such as this:
extern int (const int x);
void () {
(444);
(444);
}
by not pushing the constant argument twice. It seems safe to do s
I wonder whether there is a plan to optimize code such as this:
extern int (const int x);
void () {
(444);
(444);
}
by not pushing the constant argument twice. It seems safe to do so,
because the function called will not modify its argument on the stack.
The experi
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:55 AM, ashish jain wrote:
> I havent modified anything in that part of the code. Reordering the header
> files somehow made all the errors disappear.
You should figure out what is doing the define of CONST then. Because
from the sound of it, you are going to have prob
On 26/02/2010 19:24, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Paolo Carlini writes:
>
>> I'm trying to simplify somewhat code in the library hashing floating
>> point numbers, and I would find very useful a simple "recipe" giving the
>> total number of bits actually used by a long double: the basic issue is
>>
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> As for the relative hurts. Code compiled for a newer CPU (making use
> of newer instructions) will not run at all on older CPUs not supporting
> those newer instructions. Much hurt there.
>
> On the other hand code compiled for an older CPU that is run
Hello all,
I am highly interestd in implementing C compiler for EFI Byte Code in
gcc and participate in Google Summer Code.
EFI is a much larger, more complex,OS-like replacement for the older BIOS
firmware interface present in all IBM PC-compatible personal computers.
and the EFI specificat
Hi,
--- On Fri, 26/2/10, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> From the looks of it, you have a define for CONST as
> const. This
> first error is the reason for the rest of the errors.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
I havent modified anything in that part of the code. Reordering the header
files somehow made
