Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Martin Chaney wrote:
This problem showed up in a PDP10 C version of GCC I'm responsible for and
took a good while to track down. The fix is in generic gcc code so even
though my PDP10 compiler is not an official gcc version and I haven
[I've added the gcc mailing list to CC because this is going back to a
discussion what to do, but left gcc-patches for this post so that it is
apparent where this thread went. Follow-ups please remove gcc-patches from
CC]
Quoting Paolo Bonzini :
On 02/08/2010 09:58 AM, Joern Rennecke wrote:
On 02/04/10 08:39, Rahul Kharche wrote:
Hi All,
On our private port of GCC 4.4.1 we fail to combine successive SHIFT
operations like in the following case
#include
#include
void f1 ()
{
unsigned short t1;
unsigned short t2;
t1 = rand();
t2 = rand();
t1<<= 1; t2<<= 1;
t1<<=
Hello All
I am pinging again the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00476.html (which is itself a
ping^3)
I am sorry to insist so much. This patch is mostly for the confort of users. It enables invoking plugins by giving a
short name like
-fplugin=treehydra
instead of a fu
Hello all,
I have noticed something that is creating problems in my modified GCC,
and I see it as a bug, maybe I don't do something right. If you take a
look at cpp_interpret_string() function in charset.c you will see the
following part:
for (;;)
{
base = p;
while (p
